I feel like D could be true based on the stimulus. The stimulus says that both an epistemological claim and its opposite can both be a part of medieval epistemology. An opposite claim is probably a claim that opposes, or contradicts another claim, right? So if D is a possible truth based on the passage, in what world would it weaken the stimulus? E says "this whole category has the possibility of not even existing," which certainly weakens the an argument that centers around saying "we can define this category as XYZ"
So I didn't purchase a score preview for the August test. I want to purchase it now if its still possible, but I cannot find where on LSAC the option to purchase it is. Does anyone know if I can still buy the score preview, and if so where on LSAC? I went through the whole website.
Thanks
Ill try to explain. I didn't get this for the longest time, but I'm pretty sure I understand the difference.
for grouping repeating items, the categories that the game pieces get sorted into aren't interchangeable, they are distinct.
there might be a rule for a specific category. for example, you might know that P is on day 3.
for grouping int, the categories that the items get sorted into are interchangeable.for some reason it seems to be way more effective to make a chart for grouping repeating items than for grouping int.
for a grouping int game, a rule might say "one of the costumes needs to have the color red." for a grouping repeating items game, a rule might say "costume one needs to the color red in it"
I hope that makes sense.
I've never had to translate something like this into lawgic before, but it seems like what this is really saying is "his qualities include laziness." so H --> L. H for him, L for lazy. "He" is a sufficient condition for lazy. And contrapositive /l --> h/ if laziness isn't a quality, its not him.
Hello guys,
Im a bit confused about the difference between these two types of grouping games. For repeating item type games, it's often really helpful to make a chart, but for int games the explanation videos almost never include making a chart. How can you tell these game types apart? Whats the different between interchangeable items and repeating items, and how can you tell quickly if a chart a good idea or not?
Thanks!
I am also struggling with this. From my understanding, "A statement the argument is intended to support" constitutes a conclusion. While the last sentence and the one before it seemingly "go together" in some capacity, its not support because this isn't a conclusion, so it's like interrelated premises. This could be totally wrong tho, I would appreciate clarification
Too late to edit, but I want to add that I think D might have been a popular answer choice because the stimulus wasn't so clear. I feel like many people understood that both an an epistemological claim and its opposite couldn't simultaneously be a part of medieval epistemology. If you understood the last sentence to mean "a claim can be a part of medieval epistemology, OR the opposite claim could be a part of medieval epistemology," D might be an attractive answer choice.