Subscription pricing
I've made a ton of progress on LG over the last two weeks. On my two practice tests, each taken a few months ago, I went -5 and -8, respectively. Over the past week or so of doing LG sections, I've gone -0/-1/-2. However, today I had a really bad section (PT8) where I got -6. Really took a long time (12 minutes) on the first game, which should've been a quick one, and that bit me later as I ran out of time on the last question and had to rush through a few others. Later in the day, however, I took two more sections and went -0 on both, meaning that of the last five sections I've taken (over the past two days), I've gotten four perfect scores and the one -6.
Wondering if anyone has any advice on extracting the lesson from those random really bad LG sections? So far, I'm thinking it was a combo of not being well-rested enough (what with it being New Year's), along with not being very good at overloaded sequencing games, but I'm wondering how I can extract other lessons from the bad section. Thoughts?
Doesn't the imperfect imitation introduce the possibility that the disparity actually comes from the factory workers having better senses of smell? Imagine that one of the chemicals was meant to reproduce the scent of cinnamon, but didn't perfectly replicate it. What if members of the factory group were able to smell the difference, so didn't respond that the scent was cinnamon (even though they noted the similarity) because they could tell that it was not, whereas the control group couldn't tell the difference so answered that the smell was cinnamon?
#help