Self-study
And which one is most useful for being able to go back and find the ones I've marked...
jtjeremytang793
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
jtjeremytang793
Thursday, Mar 21 2024
I was really confused about this too, but now I think I understand why this is correct. I also wrote out:
FC ←s→ BA &
GA → FC
so GA → FC ←s→ BA
I interpreted AC D as effectively saying that they're confusing the sufficient/necessary conditions, which here would mean FC → GA. Redoing the lawgic, you'd then get:
FC → GA &
FC ←s→ BA
so BA ←s→ FC → GA
Which does allow you to conclude BA ←s→ GA, which is what Terry/Pat are saying.
For 25 I chose E because she valued combative personality traits as a key instrument of social progress in the past, and she believes that in her time, a "balance" between those traits and female traits of cooperation was necessary, which would imply that she believes male/combative traits are still necessary. I still don't really see why this is wrong, or why it's fair to assume that she believes fiction writing is a valuable instrument of social progress just because she engaged in it herself. Lots of people (lawyers, maybe) engage in work they find irrelevant or contrary to their ethical responsibilities.