User Avatar
julianalexanderhemmings481
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT126.S1.Q14
User Avatar
julianalexanderhemmings481
Sunday, Dec 27 2020

This is not a circular reasoning question because the argument does not repeat the main element of evidence.

PrepTests ·
PT126.S1.Q15
User Avatar
julianalexanderhemmings481
Sunday, Dec 27 2020

Hey you guys just to make it a bit more simple. We can conclude that most Wednesdays Zack offers half-priced coffee ("Almost every" means some to all). However, we cannot conclude on some days Zack does not offer half-priced coffee, because there may another trigger that can cause the coffee deal.

User Avatar
julianalexanderhemmings481
Tuesday, Aug 11 2020

im here for it

User Avatar

Sunday, May 10 2020

julianalexanderhemmings481

What Lsat is this game from?

Backpacker is planning to hike in a national forest. She will hike three or more of the following seven trails: Laurel, Maple, Oak, Poplar, Spruce, Tupelo, and Willow. She will not hike on any other trails. The choice of trails for her hike is constrained by the following conditions:

If she hikes Laurel, she must also hike Oak and Poplar.

If she hikes Tupelo, she must also hike Spruce and Willow.

If she hikes Willow, she can hike neither Maple nor Oak.

End of reading passage.

Confirm action

Are you sure?