Self-study
PT Questions
junaidakbar900
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
junaidakbar900
Thursday, Sep 08 2016
Really confused about this one, because the stimulus says S CAN harm aquatic life, doesn't necessarily mean that it will harm aquatic life. What if, even if one brand (Ecological friendly vs. notEF) has more S than the other, BUT all of the S just doesn't harm the aquatic life? Then the quantity of S wouldn't really matter. How can we just overlook the "can"? because I feel we must read "can" as "will" in order for (A) to weaken it.
junaidakbar900
Saturday, Aug 20 2016
unless something changed pretty sure its labeled under Miscellaneous with 7sage.
I'm still very hesitant on answer choice (A). I can definitely see why (A) is better than the other answers.....but at the same time I'm very sure I did other questions where similar answer choices like (A) were wrong because in the stimulus "can" doesn't necessarily imply "will". And im not sure if we can say S has a proven propensity to do harm to the environment. Just frustrating because if i were to carry the assumptions i have to make for this question over to another question, I can get that question wrong.