User Avatar
junioralade746
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar

Sunday, Mar 29 2020

junioralade746

My LSAT Journey – Trust the Process

As the 2020 admissions cycles comes to an end, I wanted to hopefully provide some inspiration to those preparing to take the LSAT and begin their admissions cycle. I started studying for the LSAT in September 2018 and sat for my first take a year later in September 2019. Like many others, I didn’t score as well as I thought I could’ve or enough to be competitive, so I sat for the next test in October. Thankfully, I scored enough to be competitive and get some scholarship money, although I’ll still need to take loans.

Like you all know, preparing for this exam will eat up your time and demands that you give it serious attention if you want to do well and get into top schools….likely in the process, it’ll mentally fuck you up, but depending on how bad you want, KEEP AT IT! I remember when I initially started studying, I listened to a discussion from one of the Sages about how she scored a 174 or something like that, and the mentality she developed…she said she prepared for the test like a top athlete does, and that really struck a tone with me, considering some of role models are Cristiano Ronaldo, Novak Djokovic, and Lewis Hamilton. What is one of the strong assets of a top athlete? Their incredible mindset and mentality. I cultivated that trait and decided to keep plugging away.

Of all sections of the test, LG was my biggest weakness, but eventually I got to the point where I was consistently scoring 17,18/25, although my strategy is one I wouldn’t necessarily recommend…I focused on 3 games, making sure I’d get almost all of the questions from those 3 games right, that gave me ~15 points right there, and guessed on the remaining, thereby getting on average ~2 more questions correct.

One of the best advice I can offer is that you shouldn’t look for a short cut or a quick fix and spend time figuring out your learning style, doing the BR process, mastering the LG timing through foolproofing, and MAINTAINING A POSITIVE MINDSET. My diagnostic was a 141, and I ended up scoring enough to land me at a T20 school, Boston U with a decent scholarship and possibly NW (waitlisted), still waiting to hear from a few others. It’ll take work, a lot of mental stress, and a high amount of focus, but like others have achieved, it’s possible to do well on this exam…RIDICULOUSLY WELL! You just need to be committed, trust yourself, and keep your eye on the prize. Daily running and hanging with friends every Sunday was massive for me, so I’d advice finding a hobby you enjoy that’ll replenish you and fill you with positive energy, you’ll need it for this exam.

Lastly, just like how you put a lot of effort into preparing for the LSAT, you’ll need to put even more into your apps. This caused the most stress for me tbh. Make sure your app is airtight, write a banging ass personal statement and if possible do all supplementary statements, the more the admissions committee knows about you, the more you stand out from the rest. Try to make it as personal as possible and really think about why you want to attend law school, tie in your interests and things from your life and how that helps you contribute to whatever school you’re applying to. Regardless of how scary this process is, admissions committees are still human, so don’t get in over your head about this. I even wrote about running in one of my statements.

Keep plugging away, believe in yourself and ability, cultivate positivity, joy, and resilience and trust the process. You’ll also be where you want, and remember, just getting into law school is an achievement in of itself, NO CAP! I know it can be intimidating seeing other folks getting into Stanford, Columbia, Yale, etc…but keep things in perspective, and if this is truly what you want to do, you’ll succeed.

User Avatar
junioralade746
Thursday, Feb 28 2019

Thanks for the helpful feedback guys! Your responses very important in understanding this question.

Hello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the finance committee and in AC E (which is marked as the correct answer), the options listed are only M,U,W. When we follow the in/out procedure, we find that H is a possible member that can be added to this group (J.Y. even has so in his explanation), so my question is why is this correct then given that this question asks for a complete and accurate list? AC E seems accurate, but is it complete?

Admin note: edited title

https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-2-game-3/

User Avatar
junioralade746
Friday, Sep 27 2019

Thanks!

User Avatar

Friday, Sep 27 2019

junioralade746

How soon can we retake the LSAT???

I've been searching all over for if a policy exists about how soon we can take the LSAT. For example, if I took the September LSAT, can I still register for and take the November one? What if I cancel my score, will that allow me to take November's?

User Avatar
junioralade746
Monday, Nov 25 2019

Had 2 RC's, the first one had something about computer chips and unicef agreement for water, while the second was on antibiotics and linguistics being a science. Which was real??

User Avatar
junioralade746
Sunday, Oct 20 2019

As far as I know, no pens are allowed. Only HB 2 pencils and the stylus/tablet pen they provide. It's confusing cause earlier (right before the digital arrived), pens were the requirement I believe.

User Avatar
junioralade746
Wednesday, Feb 20 2019

I'm also in for online.

User Avatar
junioralade746
Thursday, Mar 19 2020

I wouldn't say there's a flaw here. I wanna say this is principle question based off how the stem reads, but I may be wrong (I've lost some sharpness since taking the LSAT). Therefore, we just need an answer choice that matches the principle stated in the stimulus (in this case the conditional chain below).

Morally Wrong -> Offend Humanity -> All Equally Bad

Murder is morally wrong. ANY Morally wrong action is an offense against humanity, and ANY offense against humanity are all equally bad, regardless if it was murder against 1 person or 100 people. As long as you're a morally wrong action (murder, stealing, lying, etc...), you're all equally bad.

Hopefully this steers you in the right direction.

User Avatar
junioralade746
Saturday, Jun 15 2019

@ said:

Highlighting Question Stems and Responses on Android

@

Fix is live! Please force refresh and let me know if it's working now or if there is still a problem.

Woohoo!! Nice goings, thanks mate! It's working now!

User Avatar
junioralade746
Friday, Jan 10 2020

Haha thanks lads, 237 sounds so few!

User Avatar
junioralade746
Monday, Jun 10 2019

@ Hi there Alan, thanks for your feedback. I have this problem both during actual practice tests and Blind Review. I can highlight the question stimulus of both LR and LG, and also RC passages, but it becomes a no go for the question stems and answer choices for all portions of the test, LG, RC, and LR. At best, I am able to select one word at a time of the stem or the AC (by select, I mean pressing down on an actual word to begin the highlighting process e.g. picture trying to copy a word(s) from your phone, or selecting a few words in MS Word for copy/paste). When I do so, only that word becomes covered in blue and I am then unable to continue covering the rest of the words in the stem or AC to highlight them, it covers one word only, and even then, it doesn't highlight the word.

I am using an ASUS ZenPad Tablet, and PT'ing/BR'ing on Google Chrome. I am not clear on what you mean by annotation tool, but I'm using the stylus that came for the tablet.

Thanks for all your help so far, they are ensuring that we can be best prepared for this new style of the LSAT!

User Avatar
junioralade746
Friday, Jun 07 2019

Hello, first off, thanks for all your great work so far with the digital tester. It has been immensely helpful for practice for the real deal and getting acquainted with the new test format. I'm not sure if others may have posted about this before, but I'm unable to highlight portions of question stems and answer choices. Doing this is helpful for when you want to focus on certain parts of the stem or answer choice, e.g. Argument Part for LR or reference questions for RC. I vaguely recall being able to do this with the first few tests I took with the digital tester, but now I can't at all. Is this possible on the digital tester/can it be made possible?

Confirm action

Are you sure?