I have studied LSAT for a while, but I have a timing issue. I recently completed PT 64 and made -12 but -1 in the blind review. Getting -1 in the blind review gives me some confidence that I'm smart enough to get good score on the test, but as long as I cannot complete it within the time limit, there is no way I can get 165+ on LSAT. I think my reading speed is slow and is not very accurate in reading comprehension under the time constraint. Thus, I want to ask anyone how to improve a speed issue and accuracy. Any help will be a great benefit to me!!!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I want to know what is better method too. I keep getting 168 after blind reviewing and not seeing any improvement. This 7sage definitely raised my score, but I cannot improve my score of 168 and I always feel like something in my reasoning is not enough. So I also want to know what other people think. (I'm perfect with LG, but not LR and RC)
I have received nothing so far
I advise you to do the core curriculum, because LSAT is a test of applying skills of Logic. The core curriculum gives you good examples of how you should implement skills learned on the core curriculum. Without learning any skill to do well on LSAT, it is pointless to take PT; you are wasting valuable PTs. Taking a PT will train you in a timing issue, but it would not improve your core understanding of LSAT. But if your score range is around 165 or above, then I think you should practice more with PT to improve accuracy. Hope it helps!!
I'm interested
I definitely had the same issue. Like @'s advice, if RC is the only section you are troubled with completing on time, I advice you to read the passage with 80% understanding. 80% understanding will ensure you getting most questions correct. With LR, you just have to be used to reading fast and understand the stimulus. I was slow in LR, but after practice over practice, I'm now able to complete 25 questions in 27 minutes and use rest of the time (which is 8 minutes) to solve the questions I flagged.
Congrats!!