Self-study
kainoamh346
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
kainoamh346
Monday, Jan 17 2022
The question stem is phrased in a tricky manner, but it leads us towards the answer.
"the conclusion is supported if which groups of trees DID NOT show a reduction in fruit loss"
Looking back at the premise, the new pesticide SHOWED a reduction in fruit loss
In Logical terms:
New Pesticide -> Reduced fruit loss
/Reduced Fruit Loss -> /New Pesticide
AC E is incorrect. This answer choice would mean that a group of trees treated with the new pesticide did not result in a reduction in fruit loss. In logic, this could be written as New Pesticide -> /Reduced fruit loss which would go against our logic above.
AC C is correct. This answer choice shows that trees treated with the old pesticide (rather than the new one) DID NOT result in a reduction in fruit loss. This follows the logic from above: /Reduced Fruit Loss -> /New Pesticide
Definitely interested!