Cant we get the contrapositive of the original statement and fit it in that way? This seems to be what is happening in B...

can someone answer this please #help?

@cnguyen2195719 said:

Yes, you are allowed to use command F.

But they automatically highlight in yellow what the question referred to. So if it referred to the 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph, when you click on that question that sentence would already be highlighted for you. So I didn't find command F to be needed on the test :)

Are you sure? Did LSAC specifically say you could use command F? It just seems like cheating... I dont want to do something I am not allowed to!

Thanks for replying :)

I don't understand. In the explanation of the passage, JY says that the main point is the last sentence that states the conclusion that "copyright infringement is ill-advised" but then here the main point is about linking web sites? Can someone explain to me why B is not right for question 15? I thought it summarized the last sentence of the passage well... #help

I understood the flaw in the argument that it just affirms the necessary but I couldnt quite understand how to translate it into the answer choices. I still dont understand why D is wrong. To me it is descriptively accurate and describing the flaw and JY did not really explain why it was wrong he kind of just said that it is. Can someone explain to me why D is wrong? Thanks! #help

Can someone explain to me JY's pie analogy? I understand why the correct answer is C but I cant for the life of me comprehend the reasoning JY gave. If anything it made me confused when I thought I understood the reasoning clearly.... #help

I chose D as my answer choice by eliminating all the others but there is still something I dont understand. When it states that the government "does not act to prevent a certain kind of situation from arising" how does that fit our premises? What situation did the government act to prevent? I dont see any connection between what the government did and preventing nuclear power plants... #help

And on the other hand, I think saying that a book with intrinsic value=high quality book is a pretty big assumption to make which also threw me off

I guess I am kind of replying to myself by reasoning that if anything this would strengthen their reasoning. If book publishers arent publishing these books because profits have gone down and they cant afford to lose more money, this would strengthen the idea that they are only interested in money and not on the books themselves. But, I still dont really get why B is right.

Hi, can someone help me with something? I initially chose E because I thought that if profits were going down in the publishing industry, this could explain why they are publishing less books of intrinsic value, because they just can afford to publish any more of these books since profits have gone down. Can someone give me a better explanation as to why E is wrong and B is right? #help