Subscription pricing
.
PT Questions
karadzhyan419
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
karadzhyan419
Friday, Mar 25 2016
General
·
[Ended] Letter of Continuing Interest (LOCI, Waitlist) with David Busis | Thurs. 4/14 at 9pm ET
karadzhyan419
Friday, Mar 25 2016
I second the comment above! Great webinar. No nonsense and straight to the point.
karadzhyan419
Monday, Mar 21 2016
I'll be there Tuesday and Saturday!
karadzhyan419
Wednesday, Aug 17 2016
Hmm. I've only uploaded 35-minute sections thus far, but, even with the university wifi, it still takes me a good hour or so. Genuinely curious to know how others are uploading full-length PTs online. I can't imagine staying at X location all day waiting for my PT to upload.
karadzhyan419
Wednesday, Aug 17 2016
I go to the local university and use their wifi. Always works for me!
karadzhyan419
Wednesday, Feb 17 2016
So...we're not doing a BR today? Waited 10 mins for the organizer to start the meeting.. Hopefully the BR for PT 48 on Saturday is still on. Would appreciate confirmation!
karadzhyan419
Wednesday, Mar 16 2016
I'll be there for the Saturday BR! Hope I'm not the only one there like I was last time -.-
karadzhyan419
Wednesday, Sep 14 2016
@.m
I am looking out for my fellow fellow 7sagers, because I do not want them to be misled by poor advice.
Agreed.
karadzhyan419
Sunday, Mar 13 2016
On the call right now! Is anyone else joining?
Study Groups
·
June Test-Takers, Week of Feb 8th: Tues (PT 45), Thurs (PT 46), Thurs (PT73), and Sat ( PT 46)
karadzhyan419
Thursday, Feb 11 2016
Will be there Saturday
karadzhyan419
Tuesday, Feb 09 2016
Just inputted all of the dates in my calendar. Looking forward to join on the next session!
karadzhyan419
Saturday, May 07 2016
"Not many" allows for the possibility of "some". Some person having property A is consistent with not many people having property A where "many" takes on a value of greater than one and "some" takes on a value of at least one.
Not many people have property A.
It is not the case that many people have property A.
It is not the case that at least two people have property A.
Some person (only one) has property A.
Let's say property A refers to being fat.
Not many people are fat.
Some person is fat.
Imagine being in a room of three people. Two are thin. One is fat. Not many people in this room are fat (it is not the case that at least two people in this room are fat). But, some person is fat (it is the case that one person is fat).
karadzhyan419
Saturday, May 07 2016
Consider these two statements:
(1) A society that has some crimes has some laws
(2) A society that has many crimes has many laws
Now consider the following: A society that has no laws has no crimes.
Your task is to describe a circumstance in which either (1) or (2) could be false given the information above:
Could you describe a circumstance in which (1) could be false? No. "A society that has some crimes has some laws" is the contrapositive of "A society that has no laws has no crimes".
Could you describe a circumstance in which (2) could be false? Yes. Two crimes could be instances of breaking one law.
This was from PT 1.4.21 where (D) and (E) correspond to (1) and (2), respectively. What does this tell us? The LSAC does not treat “some” and “many” as equivalent. (E) is incorrect. And it is incorrect precisely because "many" must take on a value of greater than one. They also do not mean the same thing in ordinary language, as the posters above have demonstrated.
karadzhyan419
Friday, Apr 01 2016
Give yourself a break and come back to it when you're fresh.
Does anyone plan on being on the Saturday call?