I'm applying to UofT law and am struggling with the optional essay.
They recommend speaking about one of four suggested topics, but I'm struggling with selecting the one that fits best, as I already speak to my future ambitions in my personal statement.
One of the options is diversity. I'm of Lebanese origin and grew up in Dubai. Is there any way this would be an acceptable ground for diversity, or is it best to go with another topic?
I've recently been completing the Preptests with the 'Stimulate Modern' button on, was just wondering if there's a way to complete these skipped sections in the same format, as I found out that the current LSAT has an experimental section and I want to get used to doing 4 sections.
Basically, is there a way for my score to still reflect the 3 sections I'm completing but for me to do the skipped sections in the same timed conditions? Not sure where to find these without having to delete the record for the current preptest.
Posted this as a comment under the Problem Set, but am really unsure of why my reasoning is incorrect so looking for help. Won't add the question here so it doesn't act as a spoiler but I've referenced the question in the post title.
I've pasted my comment below:
"My only qualm with the elimination of E is that if there's a possibility for an earthquake to never happen, or happen less frequently, is that not safer than one that just occurred, but won't for another 99,999 years? I've tried to show my thinking with the comparison below:
Nuclear site 1: 1 earthquake every 10 million years, last occurred 1 million years ago (definitely before living memory).
Nuclear site 2: 1 earthquake every 100,000 years, last occurred yesterday.
Even if an earthquake just occurred at Nuclear site 2, the next one would still occur before the next one at Nuclear site 1. In this case, it would not be safer to build at Nuclear Site 2, even if an earthquake just occurred at site 1?
I understand why C is necessary, but given the reasoning above, don't see how to rule out AC E."
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-2-question-21/
#help My only qualm with the elimination of E is that if there's a possibility for an earthquake to never happen, or happen less frequently, is that not safer than one that just occurred, but won't for another 99,999 years? I've tried to show my thinking with the comparison below:
Nuclear site 1: 1 earthquake every 10 million years, last occurred 1 million years ago (definitely before living memory).
Nuclear site 2: 1 earthquake every 100,000 years, last occurred yesterday.
Even if an earthquake just occurred at Nuclear site 2, the next one would still occur before the next one at Nuclear site 1. In this case, it would not be safer to build at Nuclear Site 2, even if an earthquake just occurred at site 1?
I understand why C is necessary, but given the reasoning above, don't see how to rule out AC E.