Some arguments are stronger than others based on the relevance of the evidence to the conclusion and how clear the evidence is pointing or not pointing towards the conclusion. The Disney argument gives specific guidelines for how to get a pass and clearly states Walt achieved the guidelines. The Tiger argument gives clear reason for not all mammals to be kept as a pet, but is not as specific in its targeting as the Disney argument. The Trash argument gives evidence and provides a hypothesis, which cannot be proved from the words provided. Thus I agree with the ordering of the Disney - Tiger - Trash arguments for strongest to weakest.

I am interested!

Hey! I am just getting started with the prep course but eventually would love to