Your first interpretation is correct. At least 2 must be sandwiched between F and R, regardless of which one comes first. I've never seen your second interpretation for such a rule. Stick with the first.
At least 2 are after F AND before R.
OR
At least 2 are after R AND before F.
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks for the answers.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
@ https://slopegame3d.com said:
Your first interpretation is correct. At least 2 must be sandwiched between F and R, regardless of which one comes first. I've never seen your second interpretation for such a rule. Stick with the first.
At least 2 are after F AND before R.
OR
At least 2 are after R AND before F.
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks for the answers.