I just watched a LG explanation video for a game that JY described as being hard and taking around 12 minutes. It was the first logic game. I am not proficient with logic games yet and under timed pressure I know I would spend the whole 35 minutes on a difficult game. I would like to do easier games first and then come back to a harder game. Any thoughts on how to recognize what increases the difficulty of a game. I know it's not an ideal strategy. I don't want to have to skip a game at all, but if it comes down to it, I would rather get 3 simpler games done right rather than waste too much time on a hard game up front. Thanks for your thoughts.
PT Questions
katrsum96
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
katrsum96
Monday, Jan 22 2018
I totally agree. The lightbulb moment I experienced had me thinking, "wish I would have encountered this far earlier in the syllabus." It helps me understand sufficient and necessary conditions better.
Wow everyone, thank you for all your comments. The majority consensus seems to be that there is no sound strategy for identifying what will be a hard or time consuming game. I appreciate your input. I will continue to practice and do as many drills setting up game boards as I can. I think that's definitely an area where I need improvement because of missing inferences or missing triggers for setting up sub game boards.Thanks again