Congrats, that's a fantastic score! I think that the decision to retake should always depend on the answer to the following questions. Are you confident you can do better? Why?

Usually this will depend on where your PT's were at before the test and if you believe that you have enough time and energy to devote to continued study to improve.

I do think that your GPA and LSAT give you a solid shot at admission with money, but another 5 points or so would make that almost a guarantee and would definitely improve your odds. It's up to you to decide whether or not that uptick in points is attainable, but I do think that it'd be worth it.

I don't love the breakdown on this question; so, after getting it wrong, I'm going to attempt to give mine.

Premise:

1-Some people browsing web for medical info can't distinguish between valid information and quackery.

2-Quackery is more appealing because it's written more clearly.

Conclusion:

People depending on internet to diagnose themselves will do more harm than good.

Thoughts:

That's quite the leap. Lets talk about premises first, what inference can we make based on them? That people who can't differentiate are more likely to be drawn to the quackery.

The conclusion then takes a leap and states that relying on the internet to diagnose is harmful.

So, what's the assumption? We have to assume that the quackery, which many people will be drawn to, is the reason that people are more likely to do harm than good.

Answer B states this assumption loud and clear.

Damn this was the best explanation video I've yet to see. I hope this shows up in your curriculum somewhere, because this is spot on.