this question wasted my time and gave me a headache. I just did not get that establishing a beehive is equal to keeping bees.. That was so so mean.
I got this question correct. However, I am still unclear about the question and how they got the answer. It is a very unusual SA question. Please may I have some additional help?
I misread this question stem to be an assumption question when I quickly scanned the question stem. It made finding the answer alot more difficult.
I need sleep zzzzzzzzzz.
Disregard...I misread the question to say "not rational" instead of "rational not to equate"
I tried to diagram the premise in this question and I get R-->BOC. I picked an Idea "not rational" and negated it and made it the sufficient. But this is quite different from what you give in the video explanation (not BOC -->R) . What am I doing wrong? HELP
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-3-question-26/
JY in your explanation of this question I eliminated B because I read it to mean Most are not which is very different. You did not mention that so I was wondering if I was incorrect.
I thought it was tough but have you done PT 63. I did that one today and I am beat. I cannot even do the review tonight.
When I got to E I thought all the above weakens. I just quickly chose one and moved on. I thought this question was a mean trick so early in the game
PT 62 S2 Q19 on the test I got this question correct( i do not know how)... I watch the video explanation. But I am still a bit confused. Is there another explanation for this question,
Had I known that it was a MSS question (which is my most dreaded question type) I would have had a better chance of excluding E. Thanks
Could someone please help me to find where in the course I can find how to deal with "logically complete question stem". I am working on PT 59 S2 Q24 and I think I misinterpreted what was required. Are these questions MBT or MC?
This question has me frazzled. So ...the answer works by eliminating the possibility that the occurrence was as a result of meteorite thereby firming the support for volcanoes? I have to take the weekend to think about this one as well as review my lessons on strengthening. Thanks very much for the explanation.
Ok..I feel there is just no way I could have got this question. It is a most strengthen question and I feel the answer choice weakens the argument. The job is to sure up the fact that a volcanic event is the probable cause rather than meteorites. The part of B that says 'no known natural cause would likely account ...' I was thinking isn't meteorite as well as volcanoes natural causes so I immediately eliminated it. What do you guys think about this question?
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/
I think you have a typo 'if' should be 'is'. I think that it means exactly what you said. These types of rules make me pause for a bit too. I am hoping to reduce the pause by test day.
merci
Thanks for your prompt response.
After reading this question multiple times I mean multiple times I sort of get how they come up with C being the answer choice. The first sentence in the stimulus keeps throwing me off, so confusing.
Thank you for helping. I missed this question partly because I was reading two quickly the first time around and then in the blind review I just could not figure out how to include the humidity. Is "with" translated to mean "and"?
I do not understand the difference between answer choice C and D. How do you suggest that I decipher between two choices that are so close. I tried to incorporate them into the passage and incorrectly thought that D was a winner.
First sentence I diagrammed as: wind & below 84-> pleasant. The second part of this question I diagrammed as : above 84 or no wind ->oppressive. I incorrectly got answer choice (B) it has something to do the the humidity but I was able to add it to my diagramming. Help please.
This question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer choices?
I am still confused about the flaw in this question. May I please have another video explanation?
I really appreciate your explanation. TY