I've been drilling Flaw questions pretty hard the last two days and I'm not making much of an improvement. On the easier questions (lvl1-3) I can easily identify the flaw and rarely miss. On harder questions (lvl 4&5) I seem to struggle much more and often rely on the answer choices to identify the flaw for me in the few I am able to get right. Is there something I could do to try and improve this question type?
Is there a specific reason why pt1-16 LR questions don’t have explanation videos? I was drilling these earlier pts but not having the videos to explain the passage makes understanding my mistake a little difficult.
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
4/5 avg isn’t bad at all . Review it later but don’t get hung up about it.
In general, lets say on the strengthening questions I'm struggling a bit more maybe only averaging 50% correct. Should I stop an review the section?
Rule of thumb is focusing on your weaknesses. Once those are covered you move onto perfecting the other sections which you did better in. Review the cc lesson on strengthening and the idea of support. If you’re just starting off go slow, and take your time. One mistake I did was rush through the cc. I ended up having to review it again. Once you learn a concept try to drill it .
Awesome! Thank you for the advice.
@ said:
4/5 avg isn’t bad at all . Review it later but don’t get hung up about it.
In general, lets say on the strengthening questions I'm struggling a bit more maybe only averaging 50% correct. Should I stop an review the section?
I just finished the causation and phenomenon portion of the course. For the most part I understand the concepts, but I was only averaging 4/5 correct on the problem sets. Should I take the time now to review these types of questions or is it best to just continue through the course?
Assumption: The build-up of creosote makes WBS more dangerous than OFP.
Loophole: What if OFPs have another variable that makes them more dangerous than the WBS?
A - Talking about a select few WBS, still, the majority are more dangerous if the assumption is correct.
B - Doesn't make WBS any less dangerous, if the assumption is correct than WBS is still more dangerous if used equally as often.
C - Perfect! Here is a separate variable that tells us the FP is more dangerous and makes the assumption incorrect.
D - WBS produces more and thus more dangerous if the assumption is correct.
E - Cool, us in cold climates still have to use them and if the assumption is correct than WBS is still more dangerous.