I was wondering about the best method to increase one's score. So far, I see that many people recommend reviewing the questions wrong or drilling more of it. I see little to do with question difficulty—I think this would be helpful. For instance, say you do a prep test, and you get a combination of wrong answers in logical reasoning such as Flaw, Parallel Reasoning, Weakening, and Must be True; from then, you look at each question's difficulty, and they range from 2 to 5/5. Now, let's assume that you notice a trend in that you cannot get past 3/5 difficulty in Flaw questions. Would it be reasonable to conclude that by drilling 2/5, in difficulty, Flaw questions until you achieve high accuracy, like 90%+, be a better way to improve and move on to the next difficulty? Even more so by reaching ideal times before moving on. I am trying to find methods that work for me, and it would be awesome if you have something to add.
kevinorozco516
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
I may have a better explanation to this question. I think that the first sentence is the conclusion. The first sentence states, "Most people are indignant at the suggestion that they are not reliable authorities about their real wants." The keyword is "suggestion," and the suggestion being the claim or argument. Therefore, the author is claiming the suggestion that people are not reliable authorities about their real wants, and most of them feel indignant. Basically, the remaining sentences argue why it is such a good "suggestion or claim."