- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I am confused as well because this question appears to be labeled as a parallel reasoning question indicated by the tag "para".
P3: "There are many records of major meteor impacts that do not seem to have followed by mass extinctions"
"There are no (NONE) records of major meteor impacts that didn't follow from major extinctions"
This is the same as the language in AC A "All major meteor impacts follow from major extinctions"
I hope this helps.
I am interested as well... Who would be interested in taking the same PT and going through review?
Prep Test 7 - Section 1- Question 15
I got this answer wrong and was unsure of my answer. Is the correct AC A right because it strengthens the premises to fill in a gap where the deer population increase after the hunting ban could still exist even without the hunting ban? Like for example, a change in the ecosystem in which a predator of deer migrates etc.
I choose B because the key words relating to accidents and public saftey. I felt skeptical about this choice because the AC was reiterating what was already in the stimulus
Can anyone offer any advice on how to more easily eliminate B and choose A when answering this question?
Would you be able to meet through zoom? I am thinking about getting a tutor.
Does anyone know if there is a list written out of the most common descriptive flaws encountered (on 7sage or anywhere else)?
#help (Added by Admin)
What are tips to help tackle reading inference questions?