- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I've been studying for well over a year and reading comp is the section I'm just not getting any better at, in fact I've gotten worse. After nearly acing my LG and LR (-2 combined),RC has single-handedly out of the 170s. I score anywhere from -5 to -8. At this point, I'm just not sure law school is for me if I can't simply read and do well answering questions. I've tried many different methods but no one strategy yields significantly more positive results than another. I'm really unsure of what to do but for the first time in my studying I'm close to calling it quits (for financial reasons I'm not willing to go into a certain amount of debt which requires a good LSAT for the target schools I'm looking at).
Any advice?
Hi all.
I'm very much struggling with RC, to the point where I just don't know what to do. I've tried memory method and it seems like I've only regressed on RC since I started studying. I'm a high 160s low 170s scorer but RC has consistently kept me from improving my score overall. If you know of any reasonably priced tutors I'd greatly appreciate it (as I am a broke college student already).
I just can't seem to get the hang of it... any help would be appreciated at this point.
@lexxx74569 Hi! Congrats on your score! Thats so dope you made progress. I started a couple months ago. I was wondering if you had tips for improving at LR. It's for sure my struggle section. Thanks!
#help
I'm really confused, where do we draw the line in terms of critical reading. I mean the stimulus says the spent fuel rod does not contain SIGNIFICANT quantities of T. That does not imply none, in other stimuli we are forced to take this into account so why not here? We could still infer that at least small quantities of T could've came from spent fuel rods. I mean what the line then between being critical vs not, it makes no sense lol.