Discussions

khollis120869

Joined: Apr 2025
Subscription: Free

Admissions · Advice on using older LOR?

khollis120869

Monday, Oct 26 2020

Thank you!

Admissions · Advice on using older LOR?

khollis120869

Thursday, Sep 10 2020

Perfect! And if you do call let me know, otherwise thank you for the feedback!

PrepTests ·

PT131.S3.Q11

khollis120869

Thursday, Sep 10 2020

Conclusion: Predictions that books will be replaced by CD-ROM are exaggerated. Initially, I chose C, but this is incorrect because even if this were false or true - it would not affect the argument. B is correct because it does strengthen and vice versa if this were false it could actually weaken the argument. I also did not identify conclusion correctly initially because it was the first sentence so I may have rushed through it and misidentified the conclusion. However, when identifying the correct conclusion during blind review and strengthening that, I quickly saw why B is correct.

Admissions

•

Wednesday, Sep 02 2020

khollis120869

Advice on using older LOR?

I planned to apply for the 2019 - 2020 cycle and my LSAT didn't go as well. Now that I am scoring near my goal score with a significant 20 point improvement I will be applying this upcoming cycle but wondered if it is ok to use one of my old LORs from Dec 2019. The LOR that I am thinking of is from a professor who taught me years ago in undergrad and is now the president of a Fortune 500 so pretty busy...I've asked for several letters from him in the past as well so was thinking to just use his letter that is already on my LSAC account from December 2019 which he stated was very detailed. Has anyone used an older letter or have any advice regarding this? This would be the only letter from undergrad which I've been out of for about 3 - 4 years so I cannot replace it. The other letters will be more current from my now workplace and a gap year fellowship.