Thank you!!! yes! I only applied to Ontario schools! > @ said:

Congrats!! I'm an Ontario applicant too :) did you apply to schools in Canada?

it was 3.x - I am an Ontario applicant! I had an addendum for my lower GPA! > @ said:

what was your gpa?

I used to make this mistake too. When I didnt understand a word, but I didnt like any of the other answers (because there was something wrong with them), I still wouldnt pick the one with the weird word.

Then I decided to pick it, even if I didnt know what it meant becuase it had to be right (given that I didnt like the other ones). Always be super critical of the answers. The writers want to throw you off, which is why they pick weird language.

This is a most strongly supported question, so you are trying to find an AC that is basically said in the stimulus. Something that you know its true.

water vapour evaporated from the ocean contains a greater proportion of oxygen 16 and a smaller proportion of the heavier oxygen 18 than does seawater. aka water vapour contains more oxygen 16 but less oxygen 18 than seawater (complicated wording), this is basically saying that in seawater there is less oxygen 16 and MORE oxygen 18 than in water vapour - which is what AC B says, and that is why its correct.

Why AC's are incorrect.

A - we dont know this. the stimulus only talked about water vapour and seawater, not the vapour from the seawater. we cant make any assumptions

C. We dont know this either from the stimulus - the stimulus doesn't talk about interglacial periods.

D. same, the stimulus doesn't talk about this either.

E. same, the stimulus doesn't talk about this either.

Remember, the right answer choice MUST come from the stimulus. you cannot assume anything.

Hopefully this helps!

you're doing WAY too many PT. Do max 2 per week, otherwise you're not fully taking advantage of BR. You need to go through every video explanation for the test and make sure you understand it.

hi, thank you so much for your response. I dont even know why there was an alarm, but I would've left it rang if she had told me I wasn't allowed to turn it off. I am so sad today, Im just hoping for an email back. If they dont let me re-write it its ok, I have another one on file that I am ok with. I just dont want them to flag my account. > @ said:

Stand by your words, stand by the facts, and do not bend to LSAC. They are clearly in the wrong choosing proctors to act on their behalf who are incompetent. If proctor told ypu are allowed to do something, it means that you take proctor instruction as instruction from LSAC. So don't get discouraged, and fight for your rights. I think LSAC needs to refund you the cost of the test. And if there are any implications of test termination you should not have them. I hate LSAC, im an international and they really screwed me over on my foreign diplomas, I hate monopolies PERIOD. I lost time, and you lost this test. But at least get your record clean and get your money back. You followed proctor instructions PERIOD. If they find fault on the proctor, they should take it up with him/her, but do not let yourself become a scape goat. I wish you good luck!

you are UNSTOPPABLE!

For some reason, i thought that the last paragraph of the passage was saying that lawyers should be cautious of the practice - so I thought that he was skeptical of it - because of this I got 3 questions wrong.

Could someone explain why he is not skeptical?

#help (Added by Admin)

@ said:

Your paraphrase is wrong. The rule doesn't state "If there is an technology or finance feature it must go in slot 1". Rather, it means if there is ANY technology or finance feature, there must be a technology or finance feature in slot 1.

So you could have two finance and one technology feature. As long as one of those is in slot 1, then the rule is satisfied.

ah that makes sense thank you!

if it said if there is a technology or finance feature it must go in slot 1, then is it saying either or?

I got rid of A because it also says "if a person" but the stimulus talks about MOST people. It could be that, that one person is incredibly stubborn and can't quit, but that doesn't mean that the substance is addictive.

Whereas for C it says that if SOME people dont find it hard, but MOST people DO, then it is addictive. Which is what the stimulus said.

I didnt pick A becuase I didnt like the word "generally".

question 11 got me!!! I didnt read DO NOT!!! OMGGGGG

RT Scott!!! > @ said:

This happened to me in the last few weeks before my test after I had been intensely studied for two straight months. Its a sign of burn-out! Take some time off, relax and unplug from the test for a few days. In particular, spend some time with some friends who aren't obsessing about the LSAT - you'd be amazed how much that can help.

fool proof LG for sure. Thats the best thing you can do.

omg no new fear unlocked... wow> @ said:

@ said:

Is it possible to have 2 RC's in a row?

Yep! Happened to me, one of them was the practice RC. I had them both right in a row at the start. I scored a 167 so still possible to do well, but I did feel like I was off my game the rest of the test because those two bogged me down a lot.

Is it possible to have 2 RC's in a row?

Keep going. Just like you said in the tittle. This is a journey. Don't give up on yourself!!! You can do it. Dont rush. Don't test if you are not READY!!! seriously dont waste an opportunity. Exercise, eat healthy, sleep and take breaks (days, and sometimes even weeks!) dont burnout - seriously this will hurt your score. Set up a routine and follow it - dont just study when "you have time". Do it consistently.

Most importantly - be gentle with yourself, dont compare yourself to ANYONE. This is your journey and only YOU know what you are capable of.

Also the Loophole in Logical Reasoning is SO helpful.

7sage is best for LG for SURE!

nope! as long as you withdraw before the deadline (I believe its 24h before you are scheduled to write it).

I had 2 RC sections.

This sounds like the best plan!

We are going to KILL the LSAT!