- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
it was 3.x - I am an Ontario applicant! I had an addendum for my lower GPA! > @rayan12100816 said:
what was your gpa?
I can't believe I am writing this today.
I began my LSAT journey in May 2021. I had a diagnostic of 140. After months, and months of studying, I took the LSAT in October. I was PT around 158-159, but the server crashed the day of my exam, so I was had to write it a week later. Burnt out, I wrote the LSAT - I honestly can't remember it. I got a 153. I was devastated. I took it again in November... I got a 158. I knew I could do better. I wrote it in Jan and got a 160! I was happy!! I wasn't sure if it would be enough to get in to law school because I had a lower GPA... but this morning I got my first acceptance!!!
I am thrilled and so so happy. I am so incredibly proud of myself and cannot wait to see what the future holds. I am the first in my immigrant family to get a J.D. so to say that my whole family is thrilled is an understatement!!
To those who think they cant do it... just know... YOU ARE UNSTOPPABLE!
I used to make this mistake too. When I didnt understand a word, but I didnt like any of the other answers (because there was something wrong with them), I still wouldnt pick the one with the weird word.
Then I decided to pick it, even if I didnt know what it meant becuase it had to be right (given that I didnt like the other ones). Always be super critical of the answers. The writers want to throw you off, which is why they pick weird language.
This is a most strongly supported question, so you are trying to find an AC that is basically said in the stimulus. Something that you know its true.
water vapour evaporated from the ocean contains a greater proportion of oxygen 16 and a smaller proportion of the heavier oxygen 18 than does seawater. aka water vapour contains more oxygen 16 but less oxygen 18 than seawater (complicated wording), this is basically saying that in seawater there is less oxygen 16 and MORE oxygen 18 than in water vapour - which is what AC B says, and that is why its correct.
Why AC's are incorrect.
A - we dont know this. the stimulus only talked about water vapour and seawater, not the vapour from the seawater. we cant make any assumptions
C. We dont know this either from the stimulus - the stimulus doesn't talk about interglacial periods.
D. same, the stimulus doesn't talk about this either.
E. same, the stimulus doesn't talk about this either.
Remember, the right answer choice MUST come from the stimulus. you cannot assume anything.
Hopefully this helps!
you're doing WAY too many PT. Do max 2 per week, otherwise you're not fully taking advantage of BR. You need to go through every video explanation for the test and make sure you understand it.
hi, thank you so much for your response. I dont even know why there was an alarm, but I would've left it rang if she had told me I wasn't allowed to turn it off. I am so sad today, Im just hoping for an email back. If they dont let me re-write it its ok, I have another one on file that I am ok with. I just dont want them to flag my account. > @kledesma354 said:
Stand by your words, stand by the facts, and do not bend to LSAC. They are clearly in the wrong choosing proctors to act on their behalf who are incompetent. If proctor told ypu are allowed to do something, it means that you take proctor instruction as instruction from LSAC. So don't get discouraged, and fight for your rights. I think LSAC needs to refund you the cost of the test. And if there are any implications of test termination you should not have them. I hate LSAC, im an international and they really screwed me over on my foreign diplomas, I hate monopolies PERIOD. I lost time, and you lost this test. But at least get your record clean and get your money back. You followed proctor instructions PERIOD. If they find fault on the proctor, they should take it up with him/her, but do not let yourself become a scape goat. I wish you good luck!
Hi I was writing my test this morning. This was my third time writing my test and the first time writing the test the proctor asked me where my phone was and I said outside and he said to go get it and put it in the room (so thats what I thought it had to be). Today, my alarm went off (I know I should've turned off my phone so this was my fault), I asked the proctor if I could go turn it off (by voice), she said yes but show me your room after (by text). I did. I told her where my phone was (Across the room), and performed a room scan twice (showed her my laptop through the mirror). 2 min later someone came in and said you weren't allowed to do that and terminated the test. I was confused because the first proctor said yes turn off your alarm, and so I did. I called LSAC and filed a complaint.
What do you think will happen?
For some reason, i thought that the last paragraph of the passage was saying that lawyers should be cautious of the practice - so I thought that he was skeptical of it - because of this I got 3 questions wrong.
Could someone explain why he is not skeptical?
#help (Added by Admin)
The last couple sentences of the passage say that there are a couple constraints to the method, but then the MP question says nothing about the constraints only about how the method is good? Im confused.
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-3-passage-2-questions/
@kmullins2525425 said:
Your paraphrase is wrong. The rule doesn't state "If there is an technology or finance feature it must go in slot 1". Rather, it means if there is ANY technology or finance feature, there must be a technology or finance feature in slot 1.
So you could have two finance and one technology feature. As long as one of those is in slot 1, then the rule is satisfied.
ah that makes sense thank you!
if it said if there is a technology or finance feature it must go in slot 1, then is it saying either or?
I got confused by one of the rules of this game.
The rule: if an issue has either finance or technology it must go in slot 1 confused me. i took this as if there is a technology/finance it must go in 1 and you can't have the other one because it wouldn't be able to go in slot 1. How do you know that you could have both in?
Thank you!
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-75-section-4-game-4/
I got rid of A because it also says "if a person" but the stimulus talks about MOST people. It could be that, that one person is incredibly stubborn and can't quit, but that doesn't mean that the substance is addictive.
Whereas for C it says that if SOME people dont find it hard, but MOST people DO, then it is addictive. Which is what the stimulus said.
this is totally why I didn't pick D. it never said which one was first.
But A bring out the assumption that opponents of anti-tarrifs will vote - that is not necessarily true. yes they may care, but will they vote? we don't know! and thats why A is necessary.
I initially picked E, but with BR I picked B and I know clearly why its the right answer, but why is E wrong?
Admin note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-92-section-1-question-13/
RT Scott!!! > @scottmilam205 said:
This happened to me in the last few weeks before my test after I had been intensely studied for two straight months. Its a sign of burn-out! Take some time off, relax and unplug from the test for a few days. In particular, spend some time with some friends who aren't obsessing about the LSAT - you'd be amazed how much that can help.
Line 17 - anticipates developments in the arts.... later artists - but we have to assume that the new artists will follow the development.
I also think line 20 is the answer to the question. The word "unlike" kind of gives it away!
omg no new fear unlocked... wow> @jakemaynard88146 said:
@dimakyure869 said:
Is it possible to have 2 RC's in a row?
Yep! Happened to me, one of them was the practice RC. I had them both right in a row at the start. I scored a 167 so still possible to do well, but I did feel like I was off my game the rest of the test because those two bogged me down a lot.
Thank you!!! yes! I only applied to Ontario schools! > @maheeenarshad175 said:
Congrats!! I'm an Ontario applicant too :) did you apply to schools in Canada?