Subscription pricing
Was anyone able to finish the LR section from question 11 onward? it was blank for me after Q10
PT Questions
krengan3782
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
krengan3782
Tuesday, Aug 25 2020
I think this question is a little ridiculous, given the answer choices:
A car at stop light still emits very low CO2, the engine is still on.
A car turned off in your drive way emits no C02 at all...
Terrible question...
krengan3782
Wednesday, Nov 25 2020
Yes, make sure you write an addendum. You can email the admissions staff too at your Uni and let them know your score. Do try and get on a webinar, or email them directly
krengan3782
Monday, Aug 24 2020
I think this is a frustrating question because the perspective you have on history, reality, etc. strongly informs the decision between A and E (at least for me). I strongly favored A because I made an analogy (I know we are not supposed to bring in outside knowledge, but this analogy helped structure the question):
Blue eyes = hairless dogs
Greece = W Mexico, India = Peru
Himalayan Mts = Vast Mts jungle
In my thought process, I thought we would need to show that in no other place between the two geographic areas did we see blue eyes=dogs, because in reality, the Greeks trekked East through terrible terrain and left a trail of villages between Greece and India with blue eyed babies, and to this day still beautiful blued eyed individuals (google Afghan Girl portrait) exist. Greeks moved one by land, not two by sea.
So based on this, we would have to show that there was not a trail of little dogs in between W Mexico and Peru that would negate the the argument that boats would have been the most likely means. Answer choice A does this.
However, analogy aside, I guess the idea of this trail of dogs/eye color between the two areas still requires a lot more assumptions, making E the more likely choice.
Still, i think if you chose A (IMHO) it means you are still thinking critically and going down a good path. It sometimes seems like a 50/50 between questions.
thoughts?
krengan3782
Thursday, Jul 09 2020
I read the stimulus as not stating that the person wanted to lose fat, but avoid fatty foods (Macro nutrient). Are these different?
-Body fat v. nutritional fat.
if this is the case, then how would we know, based on the stimulus, where the individuals energy levels are. they could be carb loading for a run?
Shouldn't the answer be something like: "if an individual wishes to lose body fat and energy is not required..."?
krengan3782
Tuesday, Jul 07 2020
i chose A because I interpreted the answer as: "things" referring to barillo boxes that have a "property," referring to made by Andy Warhol.
would this also be correct?
It is highlighting the argument, in that, one has Andy Warhol's name on it, and the other does not. This does map onto the first part of the argument. Additionally, we can also conclude that the conclusion that "appearances alone... determine art" one has to have A.W. name on it.
I thought what made A the correct answer choice was that governments is a red herring and the idea of Nation's Economy is the whole, and its subsets were employment and inflation.