I have the same thought process? We are expected to take the premises are true .

I'm confused. In the stimulus I believed that"if farmers were to practice" and "practice spreading" meant the same thing.

In the first instance "if all were to practice" means that those farmers in that group...are literally practicing farming.

In the second instance I assumed that the "popular practice of organic farming must not spread..." means that if the practice is spreading people ARE actually adopting it. But In order for the correct answer to be correct I was supposed to read the practice of organic spread as simply an idea spreading throughout communities and NOT the practice of organic farming spreading as them actually adopting it? I feel like that's an unfair term shift?

Please help. Again, I though spreading = adopting but seems like it means spreading = spread the idea with the option to adopt

#help#feedback#help#feedback

Is this a part to whole flaw? That's how I viewed it?

#help (Added by Admin)

I'd like to join!!!

I wouldn't apply :/. I would take the test in January and knock it out of the park, and basically be ready to submit your applications August of 2023. You will have a better shot in general doing this.

The problem is that I feel like LSAC DOESSS force you to make those kind of jumps in assumptions though!

I'm not really sure what my takeaway from this problem should be then!

#help #help

My same problem! If people are feeling economically securing...then 1) Perhaps they're too comfy in their job and let's say they get fired--no longer employed then! If you look at the other way then 2) if they're economically secure then perhaps they are wealthy and don't need to work. Either way I feel like E had touched upon both points of prosperity/unemployment. In my semi-blind review, I went with C (although that explanation made sense as to why it was incorrect)

Someone have a better explanation?

#help #help