- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I thought of the the classic reasoning error that's something like "someone criticizes an idea and also employs this idea, but we cannot conclude that this idea is incorrect" (for example: Doctor says smoking is bad for your health, but the doctor also smoke. Therefore we conclude smoking is not bad). - (In this case, is the Doctor making the same logical error like the one mentioned in this question?)
I don't get the difference between the above mentioned logical fallacy and the one mentioned in this question. It seems to me like it is saying "I criticize the use of this technique, but I. also use this same technique." Though in this case I am making a different logical error.
I feel like it can well be that Demonsthenes's companion asked him for information/explaination simply because the companion doesn't understand what he is saying.
Isn't that the explaination also making the assumption that getting driver education = getting more skilled while driver education can cover other things like traffic rules and knowledges that have nothing to do with skills? Also road repair = better road = less accident like what? The choices are making so many assumptions.
When the pessge mentions "pioneer", can we equate it to meaning "the first"?
#help (Added by Admin)
Can't the nonexterior wall be refering to the roof though, since roof is not an exterior wall? This was what led me to cross out C
#help (Added by Admin)
The stimulus is also making an assumption that the people sitting in office are not regularly doing physical work and I wonder if it matters in deciding whether AC E is the correct answer.
I was hesitant to draw the connnection between "flow" and "rate of the flow" and didn't choose A.
For the second sentence in the simulus, is there a some relationship between "two people who dislike each other" and "treat each other with respect"?
The word "most" was so tricky