User Avatar
kylebarnes
Joined
Jun 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
162
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2026

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT148.S3.Q16
User Avatar
kylebarnes
Wednesday, Aug 20 2025

are the abbreviations in the explanations of each answer really necessary? "cont." means contemporary in this case, but in the vast majority of cases it usually means continue/d. Why not just type out contemporary?

0
User Avatar

Wednesday, Jul 23 2025

kylebarnes

Parallel Reasoning and Contrapositives?

Suppose the stimulus to a parallel reasoning question was something along the lines of:

A⊃B

B⊃C

C⊃D

A,

Therefore D.

And one of the answer choices read:

W⊃X

X⊃Y

~Z⊃~Y,

W,

Therefore Z.

The sentence '~Z⊃~Y' is the contrapositive of Y⊃Z, and so just as the first argument is valid, so too is the second. But I was wondering if, in a parallel reasoning question, they will ever give an answer choice that utilizes the contrapositive.

Sorry for my poor ability to formulate a question.

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?