Even if I take premises one through seven to be true; the argument assumes Walt obtains their Genie+ pass after having become a member of the Disney Vacation Club. Additionally, the argument is silent as to whether other "groups" of persons exists other than the "all other members" group of persons that themselves may have an eligibility route to obtaining a Genie+ pass.
The second issue I raised reminds me of the "Fat Cat" argument where a deficiency concerning an additional group's existence: "Other pets present who could have done this..." was identified.
Does the argument not become decidedly weaker as a result of these deficiencies?
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Even if I take premises one through seven to be true; the argument assumes Walt obtains their Genie+ pass after having become a member of the Disney Vacation Club. Additionally, the argument is silent as to whether other "groups" of persons exists other than the "all other members" group of persons that themselves may have an eligibility route to obtaining a Genie+ pass.
The second issue I raised reminds me of the "Fat Cat" argument where a deficiency concerning an additional group's existence: "Other pets present who could have done this..." was identified.
Does the argument not become decidedly weaker as a result of these deficiencies?
#feedback
#help