- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I grew up in Asian background, I know how much courage it would take to bring out this sort of shameful and embarrassing experience to others.
My advice would be, if report it makes you feel more secure and comfortable, just do it, you made a mistake, but you realized it and stopped. The administrator was doing his job, but he crossed the line, you have the right to report.
Anyway, just pick the way that makes you lessen the insecurity about the upcoming testing, Keep working on time management on test, good luck to you
Wing and language ability are advantageous for use, drinking and smoking are not, besides this is not ability we are naturally capable of
This is off point
Since in the argument, it also claims some countries
This is very clear question, the conclusion is the investment is not decreasing, the A choice says the investment is decreasing.
Not all the time you have to use the logic symbol
When I first saw this question, I just couldn’t choose because I felt it was too easy.
It’s never gonna happen if you can just find the correct answer in one conludion sentence
Such as hence fear is well founded.
I was between A and D; D indicates it could suggest the conclusion is right.
A shows that glucose may be the factor impacting it
The primary market functional rule is the price
I do not think E weakens the question that much since the landlord is also the part of the customer.
This is really bad designed for we have to make an assumption to think about a maybe case
A AND B tend to make you be more sceptical about the survey, which strengthens the conclusion
plus, one more crucial thing, support except questions do not require you to find the weakening one, mostly, irrelevant one
*An argument: must have a premise that supports a conclusion.
A claim: is really any stand alone phrase that does not have support.
*
The reason C “semi” strengthens
I got C right, I ruled out other options
but I do not fully understand the meaning of the sentence
Does it mean most ppl filed on the same day they suffered?#help
NO, you have to attack the support between the premise and conclusion, not just merely the premise.
In this case, the premise is drinking coffee does no harm to heart, the conclusion is it is safe for the entire body.
So just indicating it may harm other parts of the body can weaken it
AND A is just saying what review means, it does nothing
@charlie73733 said:
Does anyone recommend using PowerScore Bibles to supplement this course? I had purchased them prior to purchasing this course.
Hey, if you just begin, Bible could be a good start. Especially the LG part, it explains it in great details. But it often crated some obscure terms to help us remember stuff in LR and RC, which I do not like.
Blind Review Session PT 75
When: February 9th 2019
Time: 3PM ET (On Skype)
Facilitator: Michael Cinco
Join Skype Meeting:
Trouble Joining? Try Skype Web App
Join by Phone:
1 281 588 4305
Confrence ID: 9927878808
Content
LR 1
Blind Review Difficult Questions. Come up with key take-aways for tackling similar problems in the future.
45 Minutes
LR 2
Blind Review Difficult Questions. Come up with key take-aways for tackling similar problems in the future.
45 Minutes
LG
Discuss optimal setups for individual games.
45 Minutes
There is a BR session hosted by Michael on Saturday at 3PM, join us :smiley:
The premise is nothing to do with cow milk
the conclusion is probably due to breast milk
the attacking assumption would be finding the relationship with cow milk
Great, so nice to have so many people willing working together. I'm thinking to take 8 PTs together before the test. Since everyone has different study pace, some of you must have finished more PTs; Is 15-23 or 23-31 ok for you guys? When is the time convenient for you guys? Besides, every session will be in the format of online meeting through Skype or whatever. Any idea about good app for online meeting? Plus, if you guys are down to this plan, I will be the first one to hold the online study session, but you also have to take turns to host it :smiley:
In conclusion, let us know which PTs you have not done, when you are available, your suggestions of studying group.
Thank you guys; let's crush Lsat :wink:
Hey you guys, anyone wants to take LSAT in MARCH ?
Let's study together
Great, so nice to have so many people willing working together. I'm thinking to take 8 PTs together before the test. Since everyone has different study pace, some of you must have finished more PTs; Is 15-23 or 23-31 ok for you guys? When is the time convenient for you guys? Besides, every session will be in the format of online meeting through Skype or whatever. Any idea about good app for online meeting? Plus, if you guys are down to this plan, I will be the first one to hold the online study session, but you also have to take turns to host it :smiley:
In conclusion, let us know which PTs you have not done, when you are available, your suggestions of studying group.
Thank you guys; let's crush Lsat :wink:
UPDATE
Folks, thanks for your comments, since the latest ones are more similar to the real tests, we now decide first to take PT sets from 75 to 83. If you also want to review the other PTs in particular with group, please let us know, we may put it on agenda for Lsat in June.
New PT SETS 75-83
UPDATE2
Folks, thanks Michael, we got our Whats up group, YAY:) and I will post all the infor you need either way https://chat.whatsapp.com/HEr9S37YrIFBZNN6w4pFpZ
Since there are so many of you interested in this study group, we may decide to hold 2 sessions, one hosted by me through Skype, one by Michale
let me know when is convenient for you
UPDATE3
There is a BR session hosted by Michael on Saturday at 3PM(ET) Feb 9th , join us :smiley:
Blind Review Session PT 75
When: February 9th 2019
Time: 3PM ET (On Skype)
Facilitator: Michael Cinco
Join Skype Meeting:
Trouble Joining? Try Skype Web App
Join by Phone:
1 281 588 4305
Confrence ID: 9927878808
Content
LR 1
Blind Review Difficult Questions. Come up with key take-aways for tackling similar problems in the future.
45 Minutes
LR 2
Blind Review Difficult Questions. Come up with key take-aways for tackling similar problems in the future.
45 Minutes
LG
Discuss optimal setups for individual games.
45 Minutes
just find the cause and effect.
the cause is the poison would only be achieved by squirrels and rodents.
the effect is no threat to the owl population. so attack the right support relation.
D actually is wrong, since even if it is true, the whole tree can still die due to squirrels. it is adding detail and lures you to make an assumption that owl can live regardless of squirrel movements.
i am in the same shoes, I wanted to take lsat in SH, when I first checked, still available, but now all gone. So I decided to take it in GZ since I read some good views about this location