User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Monday, Aug 05 2024

I started where you are at and I am now in the 150's It took three months of absolute consistency (still going) . My biggest piece of advice is to finish the core curriculum entirely once I finished it I got to the 140's and then buy the live classes I think its 30 ish more dollars a month. after live classes and targeting my weaknesses and drilling consistently I got to the 150's. BIGGEST piece of advice that I learned the hard way: it is not about how much time you spend but the quality of the time you spend. I started out studying six hours a day but three of those hours I was drained tired and I wasn't retaining anything. Now I make sure to cut myself off at three hours a day and every hour I stay laser focused and I am able to see improvement. three months ago I felt like this was terrible but the consistency is what moves you along and improvement will be slow but celebrate every little good thing it will allow you to keep pushing forward.

For RC the only thing that helped me was the live classes and a simple strategy (spend more time reading the passage (3min) and less time answering questions. Practice practice practice doing low res summaries. I also got in the habit of reading complex things anywhere I could. For example read an old textbook and practice low res summaries of each paragraph you come across. Read a wide range of material it doesn't have to be the lsat passages it can be anything that exposes you to complex passages of different genres you just need to be well read to get through the passages without losing your mind.

1
User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Tuesday, Jun 25 2024

okay well I thought that at first but then I saw "no" which is group 4 negate necessary so if we negate either idea then make that idea the necessary condition...

No one attended who did not RSVP.

Pick idea/negate idea : "did not RSVP" negated" = did RSVP

Make that idea necessary condition: (If) one attend > (then) RSVP'd

We get if they attended then they RSVP'd

i know it looks like the oldest mistake but that why i made a reply because using G4 negate necessary I swear something is off lol I'm just not understanding it fully

0
User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Sunday, Jun 16 2024

for 6. couldn't we also infer that anyone who attended also RSVP

0
User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Tuesday, May 28 2024

Getting better every day

8
User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Wednesday, Apr 24 2024

in addition, f you are asking about the sentence form of the contrapositive i don't think it matters whether the claims are flipped the meaning is still the same

0
User Avatar
leahbrookejacobs818
Wednesday, Apr 24 2024

hey im really new to this so I may be wrong but I noticed that as well. I think it is because the sufficient assumption follows directly after the "if" and in the ones you noted the if comes in the middle of the sentence so it may have thrown you off. SUFF always follows directly after "IF"

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?