Subscription pricing
I live in Birmingham, AL and wondering if anyone else currently taking the course lives nearby! I am currently studying to re-take the LSAT in February. Anyone? lol
PT Questions
leemclean23502
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
leemclean23502
Tuesday, Jan 21 2014
Would B be wrong too because it mentions the characteristic being sufficient? The argument is talking about two necessary characteristics is it not? The argument is considering which characteristic would be less likely to be debated against, not that if this characteristic is proven/believed/accepted it is a shoe-in win for preserving the environment. I got caught up with B originally but found my mistake during Blind Review
leemclean23502
Tuesday, Jan 21 2014
I missed the observation bias regarding the ornithologist only observing the birds in the morning. I caught my mistake during blind review.
leemclean23502
Monday, Nov 18 2013
I originally put 'E' thinking the word "foreign" simply meant a new innovation to that society (not necessarily from another country) but caught myself during the blind review and correctly chose 'C.'
leemclean23502
Sunday, Nov 17 2013
I narrowed it down to 'A' or 'C.' Mistakenly chose the former but now reviewing it I see that it adds support to choice 'C.' Like because 'A' thus 'C' while, vice versa, the argument doesn't really work. Is this coincidence or while choosing between two similar choices is this a good technique?---to see
leemclean23502
Saturday, Jan 11 2014
Got tricked while being timed with A but found my mistake during my blind review. The reason I changed my answer to D was because as in the stimulus the people being affected where part of a community, or members, unlike in answer choice A where it was just a random group of people who shared no membership with a government or club, etc.
leemclean23502
Wednesday, Dec 11 2013
I misread E and chose A. ugh the humanity
This has always somewhat confused me although I do fairly well with these types of questions. When the stem asks "the argument proceeds by," is it asking what would the author say next, or is it asking you how did the aforementioned argument unfold (as in, how was the argument structured)? The definition of proceed (def. 'begin or continue a course of action') makes this question confusing to me.