Hey! Thanks for replying. I think I grasp SA a lot better because it is easier to bridge them or block them since they are usually strong worded. But for NA I always pick the answer that is the too strong or sometime makes it Sufficient Assumption instead.
Were you using PT as a way to understand how to differentiate these two different question types?
I need a lot more practice on necessary assumption. I wen through all the video but still doesn't feel comfortable :/ where do you guys go to find more questions to practice?
0
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Hey! Thanks for replying. I think I grasp SA a lot better because it is easier to bridge them or block them since they are usually strong worded. But for NA I always pick the answer that is the too strong or sometime makes it Sufficient Assumption instead.
Were you using PT as a way to understand how to differentiate these two different question types?