Subscription pricing
Are the questions in the inference category the same as MBT and MSS? Which lesson do we learn about the inference questions category? #help
PT Questions
llaurendubin605
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
llaurendubin605
Monday, May 06 2024
Same. It literally doesn't say that the other older ones were more complicated
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Apr 11 2024
Isn't this a sufficient assumption question?
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Feb 22 2024
is it just me or did JY write the diagram backwards for A?
I thought you negate the sufficient condition. so it would be if you cancel, then small amount of money spent
llaurendubin605
Monday, Feb 12 2024
I am going to get a 168 or higher on the april and june 2024 lsats.
llaurendubin605
Wednesday, Feb 07 2024
Could D also be wrong because we technically don't know if they are satisfied or not? I mean, they could say it is too specific / vague but they could still be satisfied.. so negating or not negating it doesn't affect because we do not know.
We also don't know if the intent was to satisfy or not.
llaurendubin605
Friday, Jan 05 2024
Is there a lesson where we learn this? This is so confusing to me
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Nov 30 2023
I don't think you need to know the meaning of social vs heavy drinkers. The stimulus tells you:
- social: less than half of the BAC
- heavy: double the BAC
So they tell you that social drinks less than heavy.
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Nov 30 2023
These questions usually ask to find something that one would say "yes, I agree" to the statement and the other would say "no, I disagree."
llaurendubin605
Friday, Nov 17 2023
@llaurendubin605-1 you slayed this.
llaurendubin605
Monday, Oct 23 2023
This passage. Literally what in the world is it saying.
llaurendubin605
Friday, Sep 08 2023
got this question wrong because I didn't know what aversion meant. ugh.
llaurendubin605
Saturday, Sep 02 2023
me pls!
llaurendubin605
Friday, Aug 11 2023
I would say that it is wrong because of lines 40-44.
llaurendubin605
Friday, Aug 04 2023
I love what you wrote in bold at the bottom
llaurendubin605
Tuesday, Aug 01 2023
#help Why is it not A? I was thinking that if there was no methane before 2003 then it would be recent.
llaurendubin605
Wednesday, Jun 28 2023
the only conclusion im seeing is that i'm dumb. dam.
llaurendubin605
Friday, Jun 23 2023
me plz!
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Jun 22 2023
I got this wrong because I didn't think that "immoral" meant "bad." Did anyone else think this?
#help #feedback
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Jun 22 2023
I was extremely confused by this question and after a long time I think I finally understand:
Professor G argues that all PSAPC are legit: PSAPC → Legit
We are also told that Totalitarian governments are not legit: T → legit
Then, we randomly come to the conclusion that Professor G's argument is false: PSAPC → legit
Answer choice C holds up the argument that Professor G is false: if there is a totalitarian government that aims, then it isn't true that ALL psapc's are legit, because we know that totalitarian governments are illegitimate.
When negating C, it becomes that no Ts are PSAPCs. when negated, professor G's argument holds and he is NOT false, because there there are no governments that are PSAPCs that are not legit.
#help #feedback Please let me know if my reasoning is correct!
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Jun 22 2023
I'm very interested! My instagram is @llaurendubin605 please add me!
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Jun 22 2023
This explanation was really helpful! I fell into C's trap. Thanks for explaining!
llaurendubin605
Thursday, Jun 15 2023
I feel like it is saying that they only put on bland shows because (the assumption) otherwise people would refuse to watch and then they wouldnt profit.
I guess it seems like background info but without introducing the topic we wouldn't really be able to get to the conclusion