I had a lot of trouble understanding why B isn't the answer but this helped me: Even if every single kid was watching these programs with their parents, it would still disproportionately affect the children watching the more violent shows and therefore help explain the statical relationship. That is because the behaviour in a level 1-2 program is less violent than the behaviour in a 3-5 program. Think of it like the parent's presence normalizing or "legitimizing'" talking back vs. normalizing assaulting someone.

I thought c was correct because I don't see the logical relation in the analogy. The argument never stated that immersing yourself in the country is necessary to perfect a language, just that many students do it, so how can the fact that we can not travel to Ancient Greece support the conclusion?

if this question stem was an inference question instead would b be correct? I assumed b was right because the author is essentially the whole argument saying that these injunctions don't work unless in the case of documents. I guess it wasn't explicitly stated though so I can see why it is incorrect here, but im wondering if it was a mss/inference question instead

im confused why doesnt the stimulus saying "violated these rules" mean violated both? how can it mean at least one rule?

@RSD Ah I see that more clearly now, thank you!

Im confused because isnt E attacking the premise? The stimulus says birds with dense blood vessels HAVE to be warm blooded. Also, I assumed that just because a gene is responsible for something does mean it produces it.

im very confused because the only reason I thought B was incorrect was its use of "undomesticated"

Why is the word "any" here not too strong?

Im confused I thought C was correct because the authors entire argument behind clinical equipoise is that theoretical equipoise is too strict as an ethical standard because few trials could commence and C is essentially contradicting that by stating the problem runs in the opposite direction?? we need more strictness not less because ethical oversight has been decreasing under this theoretical model?

I'm confused by E because I thought just turnover occurring doesnt mean it is complete meaning majority of fish could still be at the surface even if some have begun to migrate deeper

I thought B was wrong because I thought it was flipped since the arguments order was confusing a required condition (only if convicted) for a sufficient condition (if convicted). I guess I was overthinking and order doesn't actually matter? Confusing a sufficient for a required is the same as confusing a required for a sufficient?

@Asma That definitely sounds like an exercise I would benefit from, thank you for the help! Do you also have any advice for when I should start timing myself when drilling? I've been delaying it until I get my accuracy up, but don't know when would be a good place to start, or if I should just start now?

@GnatTaylor I have been mapping my translations but I actually haven't really compared them to the 7sage videos and usually only focus on the questions I got wrong, so I'll definitely try that out. Thank you for the advice!

@AriVilker1 I have, yes! It definitely helped a LOT in making the reading portion feel smoother and more effective, especially the low res summaries. I feel like the issue now though is, instead of going into the questions feeling absolutely lost, I feel pretty confident and then am shocked to later see my score 🥲 Thank you for the reminder on main point questions though!

Hi! Could I get the link please?