Thank you very much @! I agree. I think I should try to be more open-minded when I compare my pre-phrase with the ACs..

Thanks for sharing! This is helpful!

Interested!

I guess most people are using similar resource/ materials, but what makes the difference is how they use the resource. I think blind review would help, as it helped me to recognize my flaws in my analysis of LR questions. Then you could drill the LR questions by type. I also want to improve my LR ASAP, but I am afraid there is no magic method or resource that could help us improve significantly within a short time. It always takes time and efforts...

Please count me in! Thank you!

I think it would be difficult to give a list of correlation indicators, as there are so many variations without typical indicators. But I would suggest your review the CC in which there is a lesson on causation. Some lessons there summarized the correlation vs. causation very well.

Basically, correlation is a prerequisite of causation, but correlation does not necessarily result in a causal relation (usually not in LSAT, as it's a common error that they test!). Given a correlation, you need to consider several things before conclude that it's a causation, like competing explanation, third common cause, chronology, competing data sets, etc.

Got it. Thank you both! @ @

Thank you so much for typing the detailed steps @ ! I have to admit that I was not patient enough to do what you said and as a result rushed through the passages during BR. I'll try the thorough method of BR you explained for sure!

Thank you very much @ and @ !

Very helpful suggestions! I think consistent + good habits are definitely what I am looking for.

So my follow-up question is: how did you find your "sweet spot" or right habit that works for you?

For example, I spent ~4 min on passages and had -4 for answered questions with -4 unfinished questions, and the total is -8. Then I spent ~2 min on passages and more time on questions, and I got -7 for answered questions with -1 unfinished questions, so the total is still -8. There's always this trade-off so I really don't know which method would work for me, and how I can find the "sweet spot"...

Thanks again!!

Thank you very much @ ! I did rush through some passages during BR without totally understanding them. So your suggestions really make sense!

Re) BR process - I finish the skipped ones first and then review the circled ones. Then check the answers and found that oh shit I missed this and that word/ sentences (most of my wrong ones are like this). And then the next one. I feel I already understand the structure/ main idea pretty well when I work on timed passages, so I don't review the structure again to save time. Does this sound insufficient to you?

I feel as long as I spend enough time on each passage, I'll be able to get things correctly, but under a time limit, it's a totally different story and I don't feel any specific strategies I used in BR really aided me in timed passages. Or it may be fair to say I don't think I have specific strategies that I used in BR, because I mainly go back to passages and finish/check the answers that I missed/circled and that's it...

Oh, got it! Thank you @ !

Thank you @ ! Yeah, time management problem! For me right now, I occasionally become so "into" the question and forgot about the time....

.. crickets chirping..

Purchased PT70 to review the RC live commentary but cannot find it.. no second video below the explanation... #help...