also 23 and interested.

Damn, Simpson was so vile to Vanderburg

Main conclusions are statements that do not support anything else and are supported by everything in the stim outside of context.

As opposed to looking at indicators, I would look at definitive statements being made and to see if its supported by everything else in the passage and whether or not its an MC or intermediate conclusion. Whenever an author injects their opinion in the stim too thats also a sign it might be an MC.

"Critics say the recent movie X has subpar visuals, but this is not true."

Something like that for example. Conclusion would be the critics are wrong about what theyre saying.

23, scoring around the mid 160s now and also trying to get 170+. Would also be interested.

You can't just be blindly doing questions you need to truly learn from them. If you can't break into the 150s you also probably still don't have a good grasp regarding the fundamental things you need to know for this test.