User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Tuesday, Dec 31 2013

It changes everything

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Thursday, May 29 2014

That's what I was thinking, thanks for readn the post

User Avatar

Thursday, May 29 2014

luismoreno_26397

If necessary

Okay, so I havent seen this in a problem and if I have I cant remember. But how would someone diagram this: If necessary, they need to register for the race, mainly the if necessary is what throws me off.

PrepTests ·
PT113.S3.Q18
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Monday, Oct 28 2013

I kept thinking to myself, this feels like an assumption question with a little change to the stimulus.

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Saturday, Sep 28 2013

man thats awesome, nerd on bro, I need to read the economist

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Friday, Sep 27 2013

this was good stuff

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Monday, Feb 24 2014

I had that problem in the beginning. For me, the more I did it, the more second nature it became, but it depends on ur timeline for studying b4 the exam

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Monday, Dec 23 2013

yeah its def easier as a bi-conditional and the components are def confusing, lol. I was saying in the form, if J->F, and the lsat does the common wrong answer F->J, would the wrong answer (F->J) or " I have money on the mind, then I have mind on the money; would that be suff necc confusion with the components being so similiar, and of course I havent seen it that similiar yet, but I havent done too many PT's. Thanks for helping bret, this is awesome.

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Tuesday, Jul 23 2013

Baller

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Saturday, Dec 21 2013

right right, lol, i dont know how common it is for snoop to sing complete sentences. And then I heard it, and I automatically thought, well, If I have my mind on the money and then I have money on my mind, and then got an answer choice that reversed it, since its the same subject matter, could there be confusion?

PrepTests ·
PT134.S3.Q20
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Wednesday, Sep 18 2013

I got this one right but out of curiosity and for future questions, can you run contrapositives on principles?

PrepTests ·
PT124.S3.Q2
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Wednesday, Apr 16 2014

On B when it says presumes, if it was the right answer for a problem, would the presumption be explicitly in the stimulus or implicit or both, any help appreciated.

User Avatar

Sunday, Feb 16 2014

luismoreno_26397

Most vulnerable to criticism, in need of solidifying

This is one of the last LR type im having issues with and need some guidance. I see this stem, read the stimulus and see five answer choices that say overlooks the possibility and this is where the oscillation comes in. Lol. And I see the core, where there is premise&conclusion, and just like the weaken/support questions we attack the support? All help is appreciated.

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Friday, Nov 15 2013

Know what Book im gettn

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Tuesday, Jan 14 2014

I use to hate the Lsat, then the more and more I did, the more I liked it. That def went in my favor

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Friday, Oct 11 2013

I had LR-G- RC. G-LR , Second LR was beast

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Wednesday, Dec 11 2013

Las vegas nv study buddy for feb

PrepTests ·
PT111.S2.P4.Q26
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Wednesday, Apr 09 2014

For Q 26 ,I thought jurist meant only lawyers, lol.

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Wednesday, Apr 09 2014

Im finally coming around on these, this is how I think of them in case anybody reads this. PP -> C

In between the support, I think well have you ever thought that this might happen, or this might happen?, an additional premise that would weaken the argument.

PrepTests ·
PT122.S4.Q19
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Sunday, Mar 09 2014

tricky tricky

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Thursday, Jan 09 2014

i have, I had to re adjust and figure what was best for me between test masters and 7 sage. 7sage came up top for me in most of it.

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Thursday, Aug 08 2013

This app is awesome, the distractions r kinda funny

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Tuesday, Aug 06 2013

yeah that was a major thing for me at starbux in tx, small towns everyone wants to chat, even if strangers. i stopped going

PrepTests ·
PT133.S1.Q10
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Monday, Sep 02 2013

Is e a necc assumption or no.

User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Wednesday, Oct 02 2013

I have learned how to think from this course, and its only going to get better from here. Thanks J.Y

PrepTests ·
PT133.S1.Q2
User Avatar
luismoreno_26397
Sunday, Sep 01 2013

So can D not be an alternative, by jocko makn calls for the heck of it?

Confirm action

Are you sure?