That's what I was thinking, thanks for readn the post

I def will, So will we ever choose an answer like B, where the author makes an assumption

Thank u for the help btw :)

In strengthening and weakening questions , unstated, but for the flaw questions I've haven't seen one picked

Usually unstated everywhere else, but for the lsat Idk

Something that is a proposition taken for granted

On B when it says presumes, if it was the right answer for a problem, would the presumption be explicitly in the stimulus or implicit or both, any help appreciated.

For Q 26 ,I thought jurist meant only lawyers, lol.

Im finally coming around on these, this is how I think of them in case anybody reads this. PP -> C

In between the support, I think well have you ever thought that this might happen, or this might happen?, an additional premise that would weaken the argument.

tricky tricky

I had that problem in the beginning. For me, the more I did it, the more second nature it became, but it depends on ur timeline for studying b4 the exam

I use to hate the Lsat, then the more and more I did, the more I liked it. That def went in my favor

i have, I had to re adjust and figure what was best for me between test masters and 7 sage. 7sage came up top for me in most of it.

It changes everything

yeah its def easier as a bi-conditional and the components are def confusing, lol. I was saying in the form, if J->F, and the lsat does the common wrong answer F->J, would the wrong answer (F->J) or " I have money on the mind, then I have mind on the money; would that be suff necc confusion with the components being so similiar, and of course I havent seen it that similiar yet, but I havent done too many PT's. Thanks for helping bret, this is awesome.

right right, lol, i dont know how common it is for snoop to sing complete sentences. And then I heard it, and I automatically thought, well, If I have my mind on the money and then I have money on my mind, and then got an answer choice that reversed it, since its the same subject matter, could there be confusion?

Las vegas nv study buddy for feb

Know what Book im gettn

I kept thinking to myself, this feels like an assumption question with a little change to the stimulus.

I had LR-G- RC. G-LR , Second LR was beast

I have learned how to think from this course, and its only going to get better from here. Thanks J.Y