Okay, so I havent seen this in a problem and if I have I cant remember. But how would someone diagram this: If necessary, they need to register for the race, mainly the if necessary is what throws me off.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
That's what I was thinking, thanks for readn the post
I kept thinking to myself, this feels like an assumption question with a little change to the stimulus.
man thats awesome, nerd on bro, I need to read the economist
I had that problem in the beginning. For me, the more I did it, the more second nature it became, but it depends on ur timeline for studying b4 the exam
yeah its def easier as a bi-conditional and the components are def confusing, lol. I was saying in the form, if J->F, and the lsat does the common wrong answer F->J, would the wrong answer (F->J) or " I have money on the mind, then I have mind on the money; would that be suff necc confusion with the components being so similiar, and of course I havent seen it that similiar yet, but I havent done too many PT's. Thanks for helping bret, this is awesome.
right right, lol, i dont know how common it is for snoop to sing complete sentences. And then I heard it, and I automatically thought, well, If I have my mind on the money and then I have money on my mind, and then got an answer choice that reversed it, since its the same subject matter, could there be confusion?
ok I know this is dumb, but is there sufficiency necessity confusion with mind on the money and money on the mind?
or is it the same relationship?
I got this one right but out of curiosity and for future questions, can you run contrapositives on principles?
On B when it says presumes, if it was the right answer for a problem, would the presumption be explicitly in the stimulus or implicit or both, any help appreciated.
This is one of the last LR type im having issues with and need some guidance. I see this stem, read the stimulus and see five answer choices that say overlooks the possibility and this is where the oscillation comes in. Lol. And I see the core, where there is premise&conclusion, and just like the weaken/support questions we attack the support? All help is appreciated.
Know what Book im gettn
I use to hate the Lsat, then the more and more I did, the more I liked it. That def went in my favor
PT 64 Sec 1 Q24
If 7 sage came out with a T shirt , i'd buy it. Just sayn.
I had LR-G- RC. G-LR , Second LR was beast
Las vegas nv study buddy for feb
For Q 26 ,I thought jurist meant only lawyers, lol.
Im finally coming around on these, this is how I think of them in case anybody reads this. PP -> C
In between the support, I think well have you ever thought that this might happen, or this might happen?, an additional premise that would weaken the argument.
i have, I had to re adjust and figure what was best for me between test masters and 7 sage. 7sage came up top for me in most of it.
This app is awesome, the distractions r kinda funny
yeah that was a major thing for me at starbux in tx, small towns everyone wants to chat, even if strangers. i stopped going
I have learned how to think from this course, and its only going to get better from here. Thanks J.Y
So can D not be an alternative, by jocko makn calls for the heck of it?
It changes everything