User Avatar
lukegmjohnson864
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
lukegmjohnson864
Wednesday, Apr 04 2018

@ yes, my BR is fairly rigorous. I know, for instance, that I am weakest on Flaw, NA and PSA questions. Right now I am going through the LSAT Trainer to learn to better recognize the Stimulus for these specific question types (and since I haven't been skipping questions) & to skip them on PT days... going back to them when I have time at the end of the section.

@ Awesome, really helpful response. I think I will start FPs on full sections, mostly in mid-range PT's and reviewing until perfected. I've already been saving and categorizing each game - so I can go back to ones that have given me trouble... like you did in the past. Really looking to improve from a -9 or -10 in this section to a consistent -2 or -3 which would increase my score significantly.

User Avatar
lukegmjohnson864
Tuesday, Apr 03 2018

@ thanks again. Using these strategies will be helpful for me. I usually try to brute my way through LR in chronological order, and then I get slammed on the last few questions because I am rushing. I appreciate the continued help... and I will also definitely attempt to fool proof what I can before June to increase my LG section score.

User Avatar
lukegmjohnson864
Monday, Apr 02 2018

Thanks for the responses guys...I was truly feeling a bit defeated given my stagnant scores over the past 3 weeks. I really appreciate the positive vibes and encouragement.

@ I have not Fool Proofed LG which makes me think I can salvage a few points on LG by doing this. Any specific FP strategies given my current (limited-time) situation? - I've been tentative to FP b/c I dont think I would be able to do EVERY LG game? Maybe just drill 3-4 game types on a per week basis?

@ Get Right I am thinking I can definitely analyze some q types to focus on solidifying fundamentals - but my issues also seem to be doing them consistently when timed. Given the limited time-frame and my work schedule, I think I have to maximize my output which means focusing on LG and time management are my best bet... I am definitely a realist so breaking into 170 would be an ideal goal, but would honestly be really happy if I were able to get high 160s consistently.

@ any time/management suggestions are greatly appreciated - right now I dont employ many skipping strategies when I am doing LR sections but I think this would actually help me a lot and @.benthem I am glad to hear that focusing on one section doesnt necessarily mean that I am neglecting others... might just be burnt out on LR because this was my primary focus for the first weeks of study

User Avatar

Monday, Apr 02 2018

lukegmjohnson864

Experience plateauing in the high 150's??

Hello,

Has anyone experienced a plateauing effect when PTing in the high 150s? I need some study advice and how best to move forward since I am working a 9 - 5 and need to allocate my time wisely until the June LSAT. Currently here is my situation:

  • Studying for around 3 months (2 heavily) from a diagnostic of 145
  • Consistently PTing in the upper 150s (156 to 158 in past three weeks) with a max of 160 last month, but steadily declining since then... ???
  • Steadily improving BR scores (161-165 range) but having trouble performing come test day
  • When I devote my limited time to one section (this week I focused on LG for example) I gain 2 or 3 points in that section, but I am losing ground in others (went from -5 to - 9 in LR).
  • I am finding that time management and LG sections are my weak spots
  • Basically, I am wondering how to move forward given my sporadic scores. I am wondering if I should devote the majority of my time to improving the LG section (its currently my weakest at -8 consistently)? But, I fear that devoting all of my studying to LG will cause my LR and RC sections to decline as a direct result as well and me netting the same scores.

    I am just asking what has worked for others in the past and is it realistic to score into the 170s by June devoting 10-15 hrs a week?

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?