- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Hi Friends!
I am hoping for some advice.
My situation: I am a college senior who, due to unforeseen circumstances, only completed 1/2 of the CC last summer and hasn't looked at 7sage since September. Admittedly, I also struggled with the sheer volume of the problem sets in the Ultimate+ curriculum, which were exhausting and took hours to review. My diagnostic score was a 155, and with nearly all my wrong answers coming from LG, my goal is to score a 170+ on the June exam.
With all that said, I was wondering if any 7sagers could offer some advice as to my next steps. I have considered the following options:
1- Re-start the CC, doing less problem sets and only skimming material I've previously covered.
2 - Because 7sage encourages longer studying periods than ~ 5 months, I am tempted to go to Kaplan/PR who have 3-month models, and use 7sage as a supplement.
3 - Begin where I left off and review the CC if weaknesses arise when PTing, especially since my primary focus is LG.
Does anyone have thoughts on what I should do? Any of the above/something else? I am open to any advice (within reason lol). I know my goal is ambitious, but I'm going to try! Thank you :)
Hi all, I am currently going through the CC, specifically the weakening questions. I have found that in many of these questions, identifying the conclusion seems pretty straightforward (thus, therefore), and even at the end of the paragraph. However, I keep thinking of MP and MSS questions, where conclusion indicators at the end are often traps for a sub-conclusion. What are your experiences with conclusion indicator traps? Do they typically just apply to MSS and MP, or should I continue to look for them, even in weakening and other LR questions?
I got this question correct, but I'm still not sure why D is incorrect.
If we are not supposed to bring in AC B's definition of ER, than why can we claim to know what ER is? In other words, doesn't AC D totally rely on AC B in order to strengthen the argument?
I understand that AC E does not strengthen the argument, but I really don't think AC D does either...