This is the only one I got wrong out of the five MP practice questions. It was a stupid mistake, but I'm proud of my progress regardless. Thanks for all of the help so far, J.Y.!

Thank you for taking the time to write this out. It means so much!

Interested!

Summary: Robin does not understand the difference between right and wrong. She only understands what is legal and illegal. When Robin committed an offense, she did not recognize the fact that it was morally wrong, despite knowing that it was illegal.

Question type: Inference - Must be True

Answer choice A is wrong. It involves a double negative and is difficult to interpret but states that she committed a legally permissible act, which is untrue. This is a time sinker question.

Answer choice B is correct because it matches with my assumption. She must have done something morally wrong. The stimulus states just that.

Answer choice C is wrong because it is out of scope. Moral ignorance has nothing to do with the stimulus.

Answer choice D is not something that we can prove given the information in the stimulus. This is wrong. All we know is that because of her childhood circumstances, she cannot differentiate between right and wrong. We do not know whether she could have learned the difference despite these circumstances.

Answer choice E is wrong for the same reason as answer choice D. This is out of scope. We do not know whether she can now understand the difference between legally permissible and right and wrong.