Yes, the test tries to misguide by throwing new words but these new words are still related to the actors in premise. Such words are generalized form of words in the stimulus. For example - animals for Antarctic seals and modern writer for homer. So, it is not that these answer choices are not related to the premise. They are related to the premise, and also impact the conclusion.This is all we need to check if the statement is along the lines of reasoning.
0
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Yes, the test tries to misguide by throwing new words but these new words are still related to the actors in premise. Such words are generalized form of words in the stimulus. For example - animals for Antarctic seals and modern writer for homer. So, it is not that these answer choices are not related to the premise. They are related to the premise, and also impact the conclusion.This is all we need to check if the statement is along the lines of reasoning.