- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to compile all the questions you've missed on all past PTs? I thought I could do this using the flagging function, but don't see an easy way to toggle between flagging on individuals PTs and selecting questions to re-try using the Question Bank. Basically, I want to print out and re-test all the questions I've missed in one problem set.
Best and thanks in advance,
Maria
Hi everyone,
I've just started on the logic games section of the course, where Jy recommends printing out ten clean copies of each game. Unfortunately I've not yet found a way to do this without noting and listing the games he is using in the practice sessions and then going into all the logic games materials and picking them out one by one. Since I mostly use the mobile platform, this is time consuming and clunky to do. Does anyone have the full list of example logic games used in the course in order of when they were used?
Happy studying,
Maria
Hi,
I'm planning on taking in September, but would love to find some other LSAT takers in the area.
Cheers,
Maria
I chose C because it weakened the assumption that attribution as a general field generally and reliably revealed the artist. I realize that I let the fancy language fool me into falling into the "Weaken the Assumption" trap. Annoying how that keeps coming up!
I chose D over E as well. My thought process was that we had no proof "radiation" caused interference. Therefore, introducing this new information without requisite support actually weakened the argument overall, where as AC-E only failed to support it. So, in other words, I believed D strengthened the argument least not because AC-E wasn't valid, but because AC-D actually weakened it. Can anyone help me figure out where I got off track? Still fail to see how we can assume radiation => interference with information in prompt and AC.
Thanks very much.
Thanks so much, you guys! Much appreciated.