after following similar logic for the answers, none of them had the same relations, but when choosing between B/C, i notices the and or difference and figured that out. If you follow my thought process can you help explain why I should follow JY's method, because this doesn't seem too sure fire.
Maybe you have heard, but the newest argument is whether or not a fish is considered "wet" if it is under water. Im curious to see what the aspiring lawyers on 7sage have to say about this one.
0
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
i did a totally different thing
for the stim i had the logic (simplified) as:
a ---> b
c --->a
---------------
c --->b
but
c --->notb
c --->nota
a --->notb
after following similar logic for the answers, none of them had the same relations, but when choosing between B/C, i notices the and or difference and figured that out. If you follow my thought process can you help explain why I should follow JY's method, because this doesn't seem too sure fire.