after following similar logic for the answers, none of them had the same relations, but when choosing between B/C, i notices the and or difference and figured that out. If you follow my thought process can you help explain why I should follow JY's method, because this doesn't seem too sure fire.
Maybe you have heard, but the newest argument is whether or not a fish is considered "wet" if it is under water. Im curious to see what the aspiring lawyers on 7sage have to say about this one.
i did a totally different thing
for the stim i had the logic (simplified) as:
a ---> b
c --->a
---------------
c --->b
but
c --->notb
c --->nota
a --->notb
after following similar logic for the answers, none of them had the same relations, but when choosing between B/C, i notices the and or difference and figured that out. If you follow my thought process can you help explain why I should follow JY's method, because this doesn't seem too sure fire.