For Q27, I chose C because I thought that passage A did in fact offer a policy recommendation: “a principle of rectification” that ought to govern land ownership. I know this analysis is flawed in some way, but I’m not quite sure how. Is it because “policy recommendation” goes a bit too far? Maybe passage A is more offering an abstract view, leaving it (in theory) to policymakers in a given country to flesh it out.

This question confused me. I thought that “Driving position affects both comfort and the ability to see the road clearly” provided a causal explanation for (1) the claim that a driver who is uncomfortable eventually becomes fatigued, making it more difficult to concentrate on the road, and (2) the claim that the better the visibility from the driver’s seat, the more aware the driver is. So, I picked C. Can someone explain why this phrase does NOT provide a causal explanation?

#help (Added by Admin)

@ said:

I am a firm believer that repetition increases comfort. As you get more accustomed to timed sections and PTs, you will learn that coming across unusual games or difficult questions isn’t the end of the world (and that it’s really just a reality of the LSAT). There is no way to “cheat” experience; you’ve either taken a bunch of timed sections or you haven’t.

All of this is to say two things: you shouldn’t feel like you’re abnormal, and things will get better with reps. Your mentality can certainly cause your score to fluctuate greatly, but with practice you’ll learn to minimize these fluctuations and, eventually, make them basically nonexistent.

Thanks for your response! Are you a proponent of doing every single logic game in existence?

I also never ended up taking the test, FWIW.

And, in case you were wondering, the two sections did not vary much in terms of difficulty.

I'm very interested, if there's still room!