I'm having trouble conceptualizing the inherent flaw in answer choice B (and other versions of it that show up in other questions). I didn't pick it, but I keep getting tempted by answers that go something along the lines of "X should only happen when Y," with Y being the premise(s) in the stimulus. In my mind, the phrase "manufacturers should be held responsible only for the preventable consequences of their actions" feels inclusive of the situation in the stimulus?
I understand what JY is saying in the video, but I can't get the logic of why it's "backwards" to stick in my head. Does anyone else have a framework/way to think about it that they find more intuitive?
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I'm having trouble conceptualizing the inherent flaw in answer choice B (and other versions of it that show up in other questions). I didn't pick it, but I keep getting tempted by answers that go something along the lines of "X should only happen when Y," with Y being the premise(s) in the stimulus. In my mind, the phrase "manufacturers should be held responsible only for the preventable consequences of their actions" feels inclusive of the situation in the stimulus?
I understand what JY is saying in the video, but I can't get the logic of why it's "backwards" to stick in my head. Does anyone else have a framework/way to think about it that they find more intuitive?