@twssmith644 Same! I'm freaking out that everybody else is saying that it's the easiest of the 70s -- I think I did way better on my experimental and it's killing me.

@pjbbadum67.lu2017 I would recommend bubbling one "flip" at a time. So one whole game, or one whole set of passage questions, or two pages of LR questions. It helped me a lot.

@evatullip197 I seem to remember clay tablets being third, also.

@enoah24890 I think exam anxiety might have thrown me on my first two sections...felt pretty normal for the other three.

@twssmith644 I feel the same way right now. I didn't feel 100% about my LG, which everybody else is saying was easy, but now thinking back on it, I can't think of a question that I was genuinely lost on. Same with my first LR, which I felt a little woozy on for the first page or two -- can only think of maybe a question or two I really felt unsure about.

removed

It depends...how bad do you think it was? Does "a bit hazy" mean you think you lost one or two more points than normal or you think you bombed the whole section? I had surgery before my first LSAT and didn't end up cancelling my score -- but I felt hazy through my first RC and my first LR, and ended up scoring -10 from those two sections alone.

@tylerjacobbecker860 My graded LG was first and experimental LG was third.

@gracemclaughlin875 confirmed real!

@oliviamaeromano524 I got that question, it's not experimental. And @7sagestudentservices it was not the same question as the CEO question.

@cmelman95659 can you give some more deets about oils?

@justingraham299 I don't remember a question about cereals.

@zachgorwitz786 I got that question in my LR.

Chocolate Desserts High Calories / Fatty was real LR.

Did anyone else with experimental LG find the second one easier than the first? I blanked on the first game in that set and pretty much forced my way through tables at a fair.

I had Iron in Food/Parkinsons and my experimental was LG!

My two LR sections had a question about sockeye salmon being released into a river in one of them, and an "explain the discrepancy" about milk and yogurt for the other one.

[edited by Student Services]

I agree with the speculation about intent, but I was also sort of thinking, of course he originally intended it to be green, that's why it's green underneath. The real question is who changed it to red, and like JY said, it's possible that halfway through Veronese changed his mind and decided to make it red instead. So E seemed wrong to me just because it seemed false.

From my reading of answer choice A, and the sentence "the only kind of evolutionary pressure that can reduce the average size...[is] reproductive success", reproductive success and the need to ensure a diverse population are both types of evolutionary pressure. So the reason A is wrong is because it references the wrong evolutionary pressure -- the need to ensure a diverse population -- as the factor causing the frequency of small size, whereas the biologist directly credits reproductive success as the cause. And that's why D is correct, because it eliminates the evolutionary pressure of ensuring a diverse population as a possible cause for the goats' small size, because the biologist claimed the evolutionary pressure of reproductive success is the sole cause.

I didn't know about the acceleration! That helps a lot.

Unfortunately, I can't skip my Kaplan course. My poor sweet mother bought it for me before I got home for the summer, and I would feel extremely guilty skipping those classes when she's paid for them. Fortunately, they're only twice a week.

I know where will probably be a lot of overlap between Kaplan and 7Sage...for example, the practice exams. So really, I'm asking, since both will probably cover this, would you recommend I do them with 7Sage instead? And are ALL the 7Sage videos essential to the program?

Thanks!