The word member threw me off. I thought that this answer couldn't be true (even though it correctly identified the flaw) because I believed it wasn't factually actuate due to the test writers use of the word member. How could a compound be a member?.
When notating rules in a game, is it advisable to NOT write down the contrapositive, but simply understand how it would work for a particular rule? Or is it best to write down the contrapositive under each given rule?
I noticed that writing down contrapositives for each rule becomes time consuming... and also I noticed JY writes down the contrapositives for some rules and not for others...
Any clarification is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Thanks for the really good advice guys! It really cleared things up. Thanks for bumping this up Dillon
Thank you for your response! however I am still unclear as to what the loophole in a question like this is. By loophole, do you mean flaw/assumption?
Hi JY
I came across a question where I don't understand the question stem or how to take on the question type ( Prep Test 36 Q24 Sec 1). Is there a systematic approach on how to take on these "evaluation" questions?
Thanks
I predicted the right answer, I just simply did not understand the terminology used in A, so I chose B. I now understand how the LSAT tests your vocabulary.