Hi JY
I came across a question where I don't understand the question stem or how to take on the question type ( Prep Test 36 Q24 Sec 1). Is there a systematic approach on how to take on these "evaluation" questions?
Thanks
Thanks for the really good advice guys! It really cleared things up. Thanks for bumping this up Dillon
I predicted the right answer, I just simply did not understand the terminology used in A, so I chose B. I now understand how the LSAT tests your vocabulary.
When notating rules in a game, is it advisable to NOT write down the contrapositive, but simply understand how it would work for a particular rule? Or is it best to write down the contrapositive under each given rule?
I noticed that writing down contrapositives for each rule becomes time consuming... and also I noticed JY writes down the contrapositives for some rules and not for others...
Any clarification is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
The word member threw me off. I thought that this answer couldn't be true (even though it correctly identified the flaw) because I believed it wasn't factually actuate due to the test writers use of the word member. How could a compound be a member?.
Thank you for your response! however I am still unclear as to what the loophole in a question like this is. By loophole, do you mean flaw/assumption?