Yeah, that makes sense, but we've all seen PT's were a question has been "removed from scoring". Is this not an indication that the question was indeed flawed?
Hypothetically, if an appeal is won contesting a problematic question within a past afministration (which we all know is a rare occurence), are all scores for that administration adjusted accordingly? Also, what is the general time frame of this process, if it should happen?
Note: l'm not predicting this outcome in any shape or form from this most recent administration. Im just curious how 'concrete' one's final score is given the mere existance of this possibility.
@singerhanna865 - i'm have the same recollections as you. And same format. The first section had only 1 disagree maybe? I also think I remember an early miscellaneous in section 1. So, to narrow down here, do others remember a second section with 3-4 disagree?
Same layout here. Myself, I'm really hoping LR 1 is experimental. I found it really difficlut. I felt like I couldn't find my pace (I'm sure nerves played a large part) Still, section1 seemed out of the ordinary. Does this sound familiar? I was able to re-groub in section 2 and I was on my way.
hey everyone,
I'm curious about what a good mental warm-up would consist of on test day? Obviously, it's critical to conserve one's mental energy for the test. There are also those who require no warm-up at all. But, personally, I find it necessary to warm-up as it takes me time to regulate my focus. Any experiences/recommendations would be appreciated.
Hey everyone,
I've just arrived at PT 66. The extra diagram space has really thrown me off because I was used to the convienence of having my master game board and rules on the same page as the questions. What's the best strategy when turning the page? Re-diagraming rules and master game board or flipping the page back/folding?
Could someone define for me what the LSAT writers mean by the phrase "takes for granted". This terminology seems to always trip be up for whatever reason. I read it as "failed to appreciate" or "showed inadequate concern for"
Could someone define for me what the LSAT writers mean by the phrase "takes for granted". This terminology seems to always trip be up for whatever reason. I read it as "failed to appreciate" or "showed inadequate concern for"
sorry this question pertains to question 4 - i'll copy and paste it over
Okay,
Come my PTs and Test Date, should i be writing out the logic for questions such as this? Or, with practice, the logic will become intuitive?
For what it's worth, this same message was posted back in October, listing an expiration somewhere around December.