Yeah, that makes sense, but we've all seen PT's were a question has been "removed from scoring". Is this not an indication that the question was indeed flawed?

For what it's worth, this same message was posted back in October, listing an expiration somewhere around December.

Could someone define for me what the LSAT writers mean by the phrase "takes for granted". This terminology seems to always trip be up for whatever reason. I read it as "failed to appreciate" or "showed inadequate concern for"

Could someone define for me what the LSAT writers mean by the phrase "takes for granted". This terminology seems to always trip be up for whatever reason. I read it as "failed to appreciate" or "showed inadequate concern for"

sorry this question pertains to question 4 - i'll copy and paste it over

@ - i'm have the same recollections as you. And same format. The first section had only 1 disagree maybe? I also think I remember an early miscellaneous in section 1. So, to narrow down here, do others remember a second section with 3-4 disagree?

Same layout here. Myself, I'm really hoping LR 1 is experimental. I found it really difficlut. I felt like I couldn't find my pace (I'm sure nerves played a large part) Still, section1 seemed out of the ordinary. Does this sound familiar? I was able to re-groub in section 2 and I was on my way.