I've been going through MP questions to make sure that I am able to flesh out the main point/conclusion of different texts. I remember at some point JY says that often for harder questions, the LSAT's will try to trick you by throwing in a "Thus," or some indicator word around those lines at the end of a paragraph to throw you off. But, I've found recently that I've gotten a couple of questions wrong because when it came to the wire I choose the choice that was not the final sentence, but turned out to be the final sentence. For example I'm currently on LSAT 44 - Section 2 - Question 16, and was tricked because I ignored the "Hence," at the end. While I read the comments and understand the explanations for why B (what I choose) was wrong and E (the correct answer) was right, I was wondering if anyone has some general advice/steps to take when looking at a stimulus to figure out whether a last sentence with a conclusion indicator is right or wrong.
PT Questions
mj8830a993
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Why is it that A is wrong because it contradicts the premise, but B is right because it makes the premise irrelevant? I know that 'contradict' and 'irrelevant' are not synonyms, so what exactly are answer choices allowed and not allowed to do to premises for necessary assumption questions?
#help