User Avatar
mkim13
Joined
Apr 2026
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
157
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Colorado - Boulder
Intend to apply
Dayton
Intend to apply
DePaul
Intend to apply
Iowa
Intend to apply
Kansas
Intend to apply
Loyola - Chicago
Intend to apply
Marquette
Intend to apply
Ohio State
Intend to apply
Pepperdine
Intend to apply
UC - Irvine
Intend to apply
Wisconsin
Intend to apply

Discussions

User Avatar
mkim13
Edited Friday, Jul 17

Writing out the cat example helped me understand the word fluff a lot better:

A cat cannot exist without being a vertebrate, for there is no cat that is not a mammal, and a dog cannot exist without being a mammal.

A. There can be no vertebrate without being a mammal.

-Vertebrate → Mammal

B. There can be no mammal without being a vertebrate.

-Mammal → Vertebrate

C. One cannot be a dog without being a vertebrate.

-Dog → Vertebrate

D. Existing as a mammal is possible only if one is a cat.

-Mammal → Cat

E. There can be no vertebrate without being a cat.

-Vertebrate → Cat

1
User Avatar
mkim13
Friday, Jun 5

@kaysh I think you slipped up in terms of negating the sufficient condition in your first example, "/PR --> /MJ". In this particular example, 'peer review will not occur' is technically already '/PR' without using the translation rules. To negate this clause, it would really translate to 'PR'. This would then change your translation to PR --> MJ.

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?