Same boat. For me, I took 3 days off of doing nothing and have been easing in by skimming the prep materials. (For me, the course vids here but my friend is skimming the powerscore bibles). When I took the test, I realized I had room for improvement in LG so I'll be focusing on doing as much games to perfection as I can before the test while still living life. I'm also planning on taking the most recent tests in digital format once every two days until the test.

Not getting burnt out is really important so don't get too swayed by what we're doing in our cases and follow whatever your body and mind tells you:)

Either way, good luck! Hope you don't have to take it again and if you do, hope we rock it!

I still didn't really understand why B was right even after reading the discussion and then it just clicked and I realized how ridiculous my previous thoughts were. In order to reach the destination, cars have to move. it's a default. So non-moving running cars still have to move to get to their destination. Due to how the stimulus compared nonmoving vs moving I overlooked that 'non-moving running vehicles' are actually nonmoving (0.5) + moving (1) (=1.5 pollution) not solely nonmoving (=0.5 pollution). (really stupid to forget/think but I still thought it :/) So pollution will ofcourse be greater for non-moving running cars than solely moving (=1pollution) cars. Thus, drivers walking --> less cars on the road --> reduces congestion --> decreases the number of nonmoving running vehicles helps reduce pollution and thus strengthens the argument. Just putting that out there in case there's anyone else who got caught in the same hole I did.